PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Powered Versus Manual Acetabular Component Extraction in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Analysis of 98 Cases.

View Full Paper
DMDimitri MabarakSKShujaa T. KhanKEKhaled A. Elmenawi

Key Points

  • To analyze and compare the effectiveness of powered versus manual techniques for acetabular component extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty.
  • Conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study of 98 cases.
  • Evaluated outcomes of powered extraction techniques compared to manual methods.
  • Analyzed complications and recovery times associated with both approaches.
  • Powered extraction showed a reduction in operative time compared to manual extraction.
  • Manual extraction was associated with a higher rate of complications.
  • Functional outcomes were comparable between both methods.

Abstract

Level III (Retrospective comparative cohort study). See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mabarak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5efd374eaea4b11a79618https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00049
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper