PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2005Academy of Management Journal2,381 citations

A Meta-Analytic Test of the Challenge Stressor–Hindrance Stressor Framework: An Explanation for Inconsistent Relationships Among Stressors and Performance

View Full Paper
JLJeffery A. LePineNPNathan P. PodsakoffMLMarcie LePine

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article reports a meta-analytic test of a two-dimensional work stressor framework with respect to stressors' relationships with strains, motivation, and performance. Hindrance stressors had a negative direct effect on performance, as well as negative indirect effects on performance through strains and motivation. Challenge stressors had a positive direct effect on performance, as well as offsetting indirect effects on performance through strains (negative) and motivation (positive). Results suggest research and practice could benefit by distinguishing among challenge and hindrance stressors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

LePine et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d757f5f182769aa8b8a68ahttps://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.1985 · 4,611 citations
  2. 2Work experiences, job performance, and feelings of personal and family well-being1987 · 339 citations
  3. 3Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences2014 · 20,879 citations
  4. 4Historical and Conceptual Development of Burnout2017 · 791 citations
  5. 5A Comparison of the Relative Impacts of Role Perceptions of Ambiguity and Conflict by Role.1976 · 114 citations