PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2017BMJ Open767 citationsOpen Access

Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry

RBRohit BorahABAndrew W. BrownPCPatrice L Capers

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Systematic reviews presently take much time and require large amounts of human resources. In the light of the ever-increasing volume of published studies, application of existing computing and informatics technology should be applied to decrease this time and resource burden. We discuss recently published guidelines that provide a framework to make finding and accessing relevant literature less burdensome.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Borah et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d82042a2a48916bbbef308https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of PubMed filters used for evidence-based searching: validation using relative recall2009 · 34 citations
  2. 2When should we change our clinical practice based on the results of a clinical study? Searching for evidence: PICOS and PubMed2015 · 76 citations
  3. 3AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews2009 · 1,784 citations
  4. 4Using Crowdsourcing to Evaluate Published Scientific Literature: Methods and Example2014 · 57 citations
  5. 5Medical Subject Headings1965 · 585 citations