PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2013Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences713 citationsOpen Access

Nutrient enrichment, biodiversity loss, and consequent declines in ecosystem productivity

FIForest IsbellPRPeter B. ReichDTDavid Tilman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Anthropogenic drivers of environmental change often have multiple effects, including changes in biodiversity, species composition, and ecosystem functioning. It remains unknown whether such shifts in biodiversity and species composition may, themselves, be major contributors to the total, long-term impacts of anthropogenic drivers on ecosystem functioning. Moreover, although numerous experiments have shown that random losses of species impact the functioning of ecosystems, human-caused losses of biodiversity are rarely random. Here we use results from long-term grassland field experiments to test for direct effects of chronic nutrient enrichment on ecosystem productivity, and for indirect effects of enrichment on productivity mediated by resultant species losses. We found that ecosystem productivity decreased through time most in plots that lost the most species. Chronic nitrogen addition also led to the nonrandom loss of initially dominant native perennial C4 grasses. This loss of dominant plant species was associated with twice as great a loss of productivity per lost species than occurred with random species loss in a nearby biodiversity experiment. Thus, although chronic nitrogen enrichment initially increased productivity, it also led to loss of plant species, including initially dominant species, which then caused substantial diminishing returns from nitrogen fertilization. In contrast, elevated CO2 did not decrease grassland plant diversity, and it consistently promoted productivity over time. Our results support the hypothesis that the long-term impacts of anthropogenic drivers of environmental change on ecosystem functioning can strongly depend on how such drivers gradually decrease biodiversity and restructure communities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Isbell et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9675fe6ab964fb0835ca5https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310880110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing2000 · 353,392 citations
  2. 2From Populations to Ecosystems2010 · 368 citations
  3. 3Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis2005 · 10,735 citations
  4. 4Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to prairie grasslands2008 · 1,073 citations
  5. 5Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real‐world ecosystems2008 · 563 citations