PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2026BMC Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on surgical wound outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

MAM. AhmedMHMostafa Ismail Mahmoud HassanAIAhmed Ibrahim

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the impact of negative pressure wound therapy on surgical wound outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery patients.
  • Conducted a systematic search in multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library)
  • Included studies comparing NPWT with standard wound care in CRC surgery patients
  • Pooled risk ratios and mean differences using a random-effects model
  • Assessed heterogeneity with I² statistics
  • NPWT did not significantly reduce total wound complications (RR: 0.67, P = 0.21)
  • No significant differences for surgical site infections (RR: 0.80, P = 0.45)
  • NPWT showed no significant benefit in preventing wound dehiscence (RR: 2.44, P = 0.35)
  • Length of hospital stay was comparable between NPWT and control groups (MD: -0.25 days, P = 0.80)

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSI) and wound complications are major concerns in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been proposed to reduce these complications, but its efficacy specifically in CRC surgery remains uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of NPWT on surgical wound outcomes compared to standard wound care in patients undergoing CRC surgery. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted up to February 10, 2025, for studies comparing NPWT with standard wound care in CRC surgery patients. The primary outcome was total wound complications. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were pooled using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed using I² statistics. Six studies involving 343 patients (NPWT: 171, control: 172) were included. NPWT did not significantly reduce total wound complications (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35–1.26, P = 0.21, I² = 66%). Similarly, no significant differences were found for SSI (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.45–1.43, P = 0.45), even after sensitivity analysis resolved heterogeneity (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.33–1.17, P = 0.14, I² = 0%). NPWT also showed no significant benefit in preventing wound dehiscence (RR: 2.44, P = 0.35), seroma (RR: 0.87, P = 0.92), or reducing reintervention rates (RR: 0.69, P = 0.36). The length of hospital stay was comparable between groups (MD: -0.25 days, P = 0.80). This meta-analysis suggests that NPWT does not significantly reduce wound complications, SSI, or LOS in CRC surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahmed et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc87983afacbeac03e9d5bhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03652-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Dressings for Preventing Surgical Site Infections Following Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials2026
  2. 2Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical site infection in gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic laparotomy2026
  3. 3Negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site complications in emergency laparotomies: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis2026
  4. 4Role of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical-Site Infections in Spine Surgery – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2026 · 3 citations
  5. 5Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Surgical Site Infection Prevention Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2025