PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2022JAMA Network Open69 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

EHErland HermansenIAIvar Magne AustevollCHChristian Hellum

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Operations for lumbar spinal stenosis is the most often performed surgical procedure in the adult lumbar spine. This study reports the clinical outcome of the 3 most commonly used minimally invasive posterior decompression techniques. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of 3 minimally invasive posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial used a parallel group design and included patients with symptomatic and radiologically verified lumbar spinal stenosis without degenerative spondylolisthesis. Patients were enrolled between February 2014 and October 2018 at the orthopedic and neurosurgical departments of 16 Norwegian public hospitals. Statistical analysis was performed in the period from May to June 2021. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to undergo 1 of the 3 minimally invasive posterior decompression techniques: unilateral laminotomy with crossover, bilateral laminotomy, and spinous process osteotomy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hermansen et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2ba2d9e0feb21c591f9chttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4291
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper