PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Journal of Computer Assisted Learning0 citations

Exploring Shared Monitoring in Large Language Model ( LLM )‐Supported Online Collaborative Problem Solving for High‐Cohesion and Low‐Cohesion Groups

View Full Paper
XLXiaoyun LiuXDXu DuJHJui-Long Hung

Key Points

  • This study investigates how LLM-supported interventions impact shared monitoring dynamics during collaborative problem-solving among different group types.
  • Developed a collaborative problem-solving platform using LLM for 28 university students
  • Conducted chi-square tests and linear mixed models to analyze monitoring behavior
  • Assessed equality of monitoring participation before and after LLM interventions in high- and low-cohesion groups
  • In high-cohesion groups, LLM interventions enhanced both socio-cognitive and behavioral monitoring
  • Low-cohesion groups primarily increased behavioral monitoring with decreased equality in participation
  • Socio-emotional monitoring positively correlated with collaborative performance in high-cohesion groups, while participation equality negatively correlated
  • In low-cohesion groups, behavioral monitoring was positively linked to performance, but socio-cognitive monitoring showed a negative correlation

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Recent research increasingly highlights the central role of interventions in enhancing shared monitoring during collaborative problem‐solving. However, traditional intervention approaches suffer from limitations in timeliness and adaptability. Large language model (LLM), equipped with deep semantic parsing and contextual perception, can dynamically detect latent challenges and provide targeted, timely, context‐sensitive feedback. Objectives This study examines how LLM‐supported interventions affect group shared monitoring during dynamic CPS processes. Methods This study designed a collaborative problem‐solving platform integrated with LLM, and 28 students from a university in China participated in CPS activities. Chi‐square tests, conditional random fields, linear mixed models and correlation analyses were adopted to examine the changes in both monitoring behaviour and equality of monitoring participation in high‐cohesion (HCGs) and low‐cohesion groups (LCGs) after LLM‐supported group metacognitive scaffolding (LLM‐GMS) intervention, as well as their effects on collaborative performance. Results and Conclusions The results show that (1) LLM‐GMS activated more socio‐cognitive and behavioural monitoring in HCGs, whereas LCGs mainly exhibited heightened behavioural monitoring. (2) Descriptive analyses revealed divergent trends in monitoring participation equality across group types, with HCGs showing increased equality and LCGs exhibiting a decline. (3) In HCGs, socio‐emotional monitoring was positively associated with collaborative performance, whereas participation equality and behavioural monitoring exhibited negative associations with collaborative performance. In contrast, among LCGs, behavioural monitoring was positively related to performance, whereas socio‐cognitive monitoring was unexpectedly negatively associated with performance. Implications These findings highlight that LLM‐GMS can be a valuable tool for supporting collaborative learning, but its effectiveness depends on group characteristics and its implementation approach.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1ce3b5cdc762e9d8574dahttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70249
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper