PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Discover Artificial Intelligence0 citationsOpen Access

Systematic review of deep learning applications in physical rehabilitation for human movement analysis in compliance with PRISMA standards

View Full Paper
FBFatima-Zahra El BouniLOLahcen Oughdir

Key Points

  • The review aims to explore the impact of deep learning technologies on human movement analysis within physical rehabilitation.
  • Conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA standards.
  • Identified 1564 articles from six scientific databases.
  • Narrowed down to 35 studies focused on rehabilitation, plus 9 studies on combined sport and rehabilitation contexts.
  • Found a prevalence of hybrid neural network architectures, mainly CNNs and LSTMs.
  • Emphasized a focus on lower-limb rehabilitation, especially gait recovery post-stroke.
  • Highlighted the use of computer-vision technologies for data acquisition (45%) and a growing interest in multimodal sensor fusion.

Abstract

In recent years, deep learning methods have had a profound impact on the analysis of human movement, particularly in the field of physical rehabilitation. These methods offer advanced capabilities for recognizing, classifying, and evaluating therapeutic exercises, paving the way for new approaches in remote rehabilitation and telerehabilitation. This work is part of a larger systematic review focusing on the analysis of human movement in sport and rehabilitation, considered as complementary fields sharing common methodological, biomechanical and technological issues. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, 1564 articles were initially identified from six major scientific databases. After applying the inclusion criteria, 35 studies were selected for detailed analysis in rehabilitation. An additional 9 studies addressing combined sport and rehabilitation contexts were also considered to provide complementary insights. The results reveal a preference for hybrid neural network architectures combining convolutional neural networks (CNN)(40%) and recurrent neural networks (Long Short-Term Memory and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory)(31%), there jointly the spatial and temporal dimensions of human movement, but the most studies focus on lower-limb rehabilitation(37%), particularly related to gait recovery and post-stroke motor disorders. Frequently, researchers used data-acquisition systems rely on computer-vision technologies (standard color cameras and color-depth cameras)(45%), followed by Inertial Measurement Units sensors(IMU) and biological sensing devices (electromyography and electroencephalography). This points to growing interest in multimodal sensor fusion. The integration of work from sport makes it possible to broaden the analysis to complex, dynamic and highly variable movements, thus strengthening the relevance and scope of the approaches developed for clinical rehabilitation. Although the analyzed studies demonstrate the strong potential of deep learning for automatic movement assessment and therapeutic exercise classification, several methodological limitations persist. A comprehensive review of rehabilitation therefore requires consideration of work from sport, whose methodological and technological contributions help to better address the overall challenges of human movement analysis. These limitations include small sample sizes, the use of proprietary datasets, and experiments conducted mainly in controlled laboratory settings rather than real-world rehabilitation environments. Such conditions restrict the generalizability of the findings and hinder their direct deployment in practical clinical scenarios. Consequently, while deep learning approaches show promising opportunities for more intelligent, personalized, and connected rehabilitation, their translation from technical performance to real-life therapeutic impact remains limited.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bouni et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320fd40886becb654026chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-01142-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Transferable Deep Learning Prognosis Model for Predicting Stroke Patients' Recovery in Different Rehabilitation Trainings2022 · 31 citations
  2. 2Automatic multi-IMU-based deep learning evaluation of intensity during static standing balance training exercises2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3An AI-enabled self-sustaining sensing lower-limb motion detection system for HMI in the metaverse2025 · 22 citations
  4. 4EMG controlled mobile robot equipped with gripper mechanism for fine motor skills training in rehabilitation2025 · 6 citations
  5. 5HDL-PSR: Modelling Spatio-Temporal Features Using Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation2022 · 86 citations