PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Buildings0 citationsOpen Access

Analysis of Structural Contact and Collision Behavior Based on Member Discrete Element Method for Large-Span Structures

View Full Paper
QXQiang XuCSChuanzhi SunQLQuan Li

Key Points

  • To improve the simulation of structural collisions in large-span structures using a refined member discrete element method.
  • Extended the member discrete element method framework for collision analysis.
  • Established unified contact models for point-line and line-line interactions.
  • Introduced the concept of a virtual contact point pair for critical constraints.
  • Developed a Fortran-based computational program for simulations.
  • Achieved a maximum relative error of 4.2% for the elastic ring scenario and 3.1% for the double cantilever beam.
  • Demonstrated rebound angle deviation of less than 2° in the flexible ring impact case.
  • Attained 95–98% accuracy compared to reference solutions without reconstructing global stiffness matrices.

Abstract

Large-span structures may experience progressive collapse involving complex member collisions, for which efficient and accurate simulation remains a challenging problem in engineering practice. Conventional finite element methods are computationally inefficient in such scenarios due to repeated reconstruction of contact constraints and global stiffness matrices, while existing member discrete element method (MDEM) approaches lack a unified contact algorithm capable of handling both “point–line” and “line–line” contact modes. To address these limitations, this study extends the MDEM framework for structural collision analyses by establishing unified “point–line” and “line–line” contact models. A “virtual contact point pair” concept was introduced to define critical contact constraints, and corresponding contact force formulations were derived. A Fortran-based computational program was developed. Numerical validation through typical examples showed that the maximum relative error was 4.2% for the elastic ring problem and 3.1% for the double cantilever beam, while the rebound angle deviation in the flexible ring impact case was less than 2°. The proposed method avoids global stiffness matrix reconstruction and achieves a 95–98% accuracy compared to reference solutions under recommended parameters, providing an efficient approach for simulating member collisions in large-span structural collapse and supporting engineering analyses and design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320fd40886becb6540357https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081582
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper