PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 20, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology7,814 citations

Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography

View Full Paper
AAArthur S. AgatstonWJWarren R. JanowitzFHFrank J. Hildner

Key Result

Ultrafast computed tomography was more sensitive than fluoroscopy for detecting coronary calcium (90% vs 52%) and showed significantly higher calcium scores in patients with clinical CAD (p<0.0001).

Key Points

  • To quantify coronary artery calcium levels in individuals with and without clinical coronary artery disease using ultrafast computed tomography.
  • Evaluated 584 subjects and 50 patients undergoing fluoroscopy and ultrafast computed tomography.
  • Calculated total calcium scores based on the number and areas of calcific lesions across 20 contiguous 3 mm slices.
  • Assessed interobserver agreement with independent scoring by two readers.
  • Ultrafast computed tomography detected coronary calcium in 90% of patients compared to 52% using fluoroscopy.
  • Significant differences observed in mean total calcium scores for those with and without coronary artery disease across age decades (p < 0.0001).
  • For age group 60-69, a total score of 300 yielded a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 81%.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=584)

Structured PICO

Does ultrafast computed tomography accurately detect and quantify coronary artery calcium compared to fluoroscopy, and does it correlate with clinical coronary artery disease?

P
Population
584 subjects (mean age 48 +/- 10 years) with (n = 109) and without (n = 475) clinical coronary artery disease. A subset of 50 patients also underwent fluoroscopy.
I
Intervention
Ultrafast computed tomography (20 contiguous 3 mm slices of the proximal coronary arteries)
C
Comparator
Fluoroscopy (in a subset of 50 patients) and comparison between patients with vs. without clinical coronary artery disease
O
Outcome
Detection and quantification of coronary artery calcium (total calcium scores, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for clinical coronary artery disease)surrogate

Ultrafast computed tomography is a highly sensitive and specific non-invasive imaging modality for detecting and quantifying coronary artery calcium, which correlates strongly with the presence of clinical coronary artery disease.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 90% vs 52%

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

Ultrafast computed tomography was used to detect and quantify coronary artery calcium levels in 584 subjects (mean age 48 +/- 10 years) with (n = 109) and without (n = 475) clinical coronary artery disease. Fifty patients who underwent fluoroscopy and ultrafast computed tomography were also evaluated. Twenty contiguous 3 mm slices were obtained of the proximal coronary arteries. Total calcium scores were calculated based on the number, areas and peak Hounsfield computed tomographic numbers of the calcific lesions detected. In 88 subjects scored by two readers independently, interobserver agreement was excellent with identical total scores obtained in 70. Ultrafast computed tomography was more sensitive than fluoroscopy, detecting coronary calcium in 90% versus 52% of patients. There were significant differences (p less than 0.0001) in mean total calcium scores for those with versus those without clinical coronary artery disease by decade: 5 versus 132, age 30 to 39 years; 27 versus 291, age 40 to 49 years; 83 versus 462, age 50 to 59 years; and 187 versus 786, age 60 to 69 years. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for clinical coronary artery disease were calculated for several total calcium scores in each decade. For age groups 40 to 49 and 50 to 59 years, a total score of 50 resulted in a sensitivity of 71% and 74% and a specificity of 91% and 70%, respectively. For age group 60 to 69 years, a total score of 300 gave a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 81%. The negative predictive value of a 0 score was 98%, 94% and 100% for age groups 40 to 49, 50 to 59 and 60 to 69 years, respectively. Ultrafast computed tomography is an excellent tool for detecting and quantifying coronary artery calcium.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Agatston et al. (1990) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=584). Ultrafast computed tomography vs. Fluoroscopy was evaluated on Detection of coronary calcium (p=<0.0001). Ultrafast computed tomography was more sensitive than fluoroscopy for detecting coronary calcium (90% vs 52%) and showed significantly higher calcium scores in patients with clinical CAD (p<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e5ef84f5d1af861d55efa2https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Detection of calcific deposits in coronary arteries by ultrafast computed tomography and correlation with angiography1989 · 181 citations
  2. 2Coronary calcification in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease1979 · 173 citations
  3. 3Calcification of the coronary arteries.1959 · 155 citations
  4. 4The diagnostic and prognostic significance of coronary artery calcification. A report of 800 cases.1980 · 269 citations
  5. 5CALCIFICATION IN THE CORONARY ARTERIES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO ARTERIOSCLEROSIS AND MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION.1964 · 140 citations