PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026World Journal of Surgical Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

International Delphi consensus to define textbook outcome parameters for oncological gastrectomy (togs project)

SCSilvia Carbonell‐MoroteHDHiroyuki DaikoGMGiovanni De Manzoni

Key Points

  • The goal is to create a standardized set of parameters for evaluating outcomes in gastric oncological surgery.
  • Delphi consensus method involving four phases: a systematic review, expert panel discussions, anonymous surveys, and revision of parameters.
  • Engaged 39 international experts in gastric cancer surgery for the survey process across three rounds, with consensus set at ≥ 70%.
  • Identified ten key parameters for postoperative outcomes in oncological gastrectomy.
  • Achieved consensus on parameters including no 90-day mortality and R0 resection.
  • Agreement was reached on no complications ≥ III and analyzing more than 25 lymph nodes.
  • Validation of these consensus parameters in clinical practice is required to establish them as universal quality metrics.

Abstract

Textbook Outcome (TO) is a quality indicator representing the ideal surgical postoperative course. The lack of consensus on TO parameters in Gastric Oncological Surgery (TOGS) hinders comparative outcomes analysis. This study aimed to establish a universally accepted set of TOGS parameters using Delphi consensus made by international experts in gastric cancer surgery. The Delphi process involved four phases: 1. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review revealed significant variability in TOGS parameters. 2. Expert Panel Discussion: Eight international experts developed 18 preliminary questions for a survey. 3. Delphi Process: Two rounds of anonymous surveys among key opinion leaders measured agreement using a 5-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as ≥ 70%. A third round was conducted to revise questions on mortality, lymph nodes, and hospital stay. 4. Generation of Recommendations were created based on consensus from the three rounds Of 53 invited surgeons, 39 responded, and 34 completed both rounds. By the second round, ten parameters were agreed upon. 1) No 90-day mortality; 2) No complications ≥ III according to Clavien-Dindo classification; 3) No intraoperative complications according to the GASTRODATA classification; 4) R0 resection; 5) More than 25 lymph nodes analyzed in the surgical specimen; 6) No reoperation; 7) No readmission to the Intensive care Unit (ICU); 8) No readmission in the first 30 postoperative days; 9) Length of stay below the 75th percentile of the series; 10) Resumption of chemotherapy treatment, if indicated, within 8 weeks after surgery. TOGS consensus definition includes ten parameters specific to gastric cancer treatment. Validation in clinical practice is needed to confirm the proposed TOGS definition as a universal quality metric.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carbonell‐Morote et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edabdf4a46254e215b3bb3https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04314-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper