PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Animal nutrition1 citationsOpen Access

Enhancing lactation performance and energy utilisation efficiency through dietary inclusion of apple pomace silage and hempseed cake in dairy cows

View Full Paper
BXBenchu XueTYT YanSSSokratis Stergiadis

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the effects of apple pomace silage and hempseed cake on lactation performance and energy utilization in dairy cows.
  • Three treatments (control, AP, HC) were evaluated in a 3×3 Latin square design with 15 mid-lactation dairy cows.
  • Each treatment represented different dietary inclusions of apple pomace silage and hempseed cake over three 24-day periods.
  • Data collected included dry matter intake, milk yield, protein digestibility, and energy outputs.
  • Dietary inclusion of AP and HC significantly increased DM intake by 6.7% and 3.4% (P=0.001) and milk yield by 8.8% and 11.3% (P<0.001) compared to control.
  • Both AP and HC decreased heat production as a proportion of gross energy intake by 10.7% and 7.6% respectively (P<0.001).
  • Efficiencies of metabolizable energy used for lactation improved by 4.3% in AP and 7.7% in HC groups (P=0.017) compared to control.

Abstract

Apple pomace (AP) and hempseed cake (HC) are used for replacing conventional feed ingredients in dairy farming, but their effects on energy partitioning remains insufficiently explored. This study investigated the effects of dietary inclusion of AP silage and HC to mid-lactation dairy cows on lactation performance and energy utilisation efficiency. Fifteen dairy cows (133 ± 2.6 d in milk, 637 ± 13.1 body weight, 2.4 ± 0.28 parities) were used in a 3 (treatments) × 3 (periods) Latin square design study with three treatments and three periods (24 d/period). Treatment diets included (dry matter DM basis) control (CON, basal diet containing 50.0% concentrates, 45.7% grass silage and 4.3% barley straw), AP (10% of AP replaced grass silage in the CON diet), and HC diets (10% of HC replaced concentrates in the CON diet). Dietary inclusion of AP or HC significantly increased DM intake (DMI) by 6.7% and 3.4% ( P = 0.001), milk yield by 8.8% and 11.3% ( P < 0.001), respectively, compared with the CON. Milk yield/DMI was the highest in the HC group, followed by the AP and CON groups ( P = 0.022). Crude protein digestibility was higher in the AP group than in the CON group ( P = 0.038). When compared with the CON, both AP and HC tended to increase rumen propionate production ( P = 0.082) and significantly decreased rumen acetate-to-propionate ratio ( P = 0.040). Urinary and methane energy outputs and heat production as a proportion of gross energy (GE) intake significantly decreased when diets were supplemented with AP and HC ( P < 0.05), and the inclusion of AP also increased retained energy as a proportion of GE intake. Feeding AP and HC significantly decreased heat production/metabolisable energy (ME) intake by 10.7% and 7.6%, respectively ( P < 0.001). Higher efficiency of ME used for lactation was observed in the AP and HC groups, increasing by 4.3% and 7.7% ( P = 0.017), respectively, compared to the CON. Overall, AP silage and HC are promising alternatives to high-quality grass silage and conventional protein feeds in dairy cow diets. These by-products can enhance the lactation performance and improve cow’s energy utilisation efficiency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xue et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd64fede9185760d40c7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2026.01.005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper