PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Riemann Hypothesis: A Direct Proof via Even Dominance of the Weil Quadratic Form (DRAFT)

View Full Paper
LGLukas Geiger

Key Points

  • The aim is to provide a direct proof of the Riemann Hypothesis using the even-dominance condition of the Weil quadratic form.
  • Extracted proof core from the Landscape series on Riemann Hypothesis
  • Used Connes' reduction and four key inputs for analytical proof
  • Analyzed inputs regarding quadratic forms, parity advantages, and prime number behavior.
  • Proven ground state is simple and even along a sequence as lambda approaches infinity
  • Achieved validation through interval-arithmetic for range 100 to 1,300,000
  • Demonstrated frontier dominance using key estimates from number theory.

Abstract

This paper extracts the proof core from a three-part Landscape series on the Riemann Hypothesis (Geiger 2026, Zenodo concept-DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 19035640). The Landscape papers document the full research process, including failed routes, obstruction theorems, computational certificates, and alternative strategies. The present paper keeps only the proof-relevant chain. Following Connes' reduction of the Riemann Hypothesis to an even-dominance condition for the Weil quadratic form, we prove that the relevant ground state is simple and even along a sequence lambdaₙ -> infinity. The proof has four inputs: (i) Connes-van Suijlekom's real-zero criterion for quadratic forms (Theorem 6. 1 of Connes 2026, together with the Hurwitz bridge of Section 6. 4-6. 6) ; (ii) the Shift Parity Lemma, a finite trigonometric matrix theorem showing that every admissible prime shift has an intrinsic even-sector advantage; (iii) interval-arithmetic certificates for the finite range 100 <= lambda <= 1, 300, 000; and (iv) a frontier-dominance argument based on the Prime Number Theorem, Mertens-type estimates, and a common Rayleigh-vector bound for primes p with log p / log lambda near 1. Step (i) is taken as an external input from the Connes program; the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis presented here is therefore conditional on those two results until they are independently published. Steps (ii) - (iv) are self-contained and analytical, with the finite range and the asymptotic threshold meeting exactly at 1, 300, 000. DRAFT version. Subject to revisions. The excluded gauge, total-positivity, and universal-commutator routes are not used in the proof and are referred to the Landscape series.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lukas Geiger (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefdb5fede9185760d46ffhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19764772
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper