PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 20266 citationsOpen Access

Derivation of Fundamental Constants from Aether Closure: Magnetic Charge, Chronovibration, and Gravitational Scaling in QMU

View Full Paper
DTDavid W. Thomson

Key Points

  • This work aims to derive fundamental physical constants from a closed framework within the Aether Physics Model using Quantum Measurement Units.
  • Developed a derivation framework starting from a minimal substrate set including electrostatic charge and gravitational substrate quantity.
  • Established propagation relations such as c = λC Fq for light and charge relations interpreted through geometric ratios.
  • Utilized CODATA 2022 values to confirm the derived constants c, h, and G within the SI system.
  • Closure relations reproduce known values of c, h, and G with high accuracy.
  • Unified relationships among propagation, charge, and gravitational structures in a single hierarchy.
  • Demonstrated that observable constants are projections from fundamental volumetric-chronovibrational geometry rather than separate empirical quantities.

Abstract

This work develops a closed derivation framework for fundamental physical constants within the Aether Physics Model (APM) using Quantum Measurement Units (QMU). The approach begins from a minimal substrate set consisting of electrostatic charge, a gravitational substrate quantity (denoted Gforce), electron mass, the Compton wavelength, and a fundamental quantum frequency. From these quantities, all major physical constants are derived through geometric closure relations. The propagation relation is given by = C Fq, the speed of light as a direct consequence of spatial and chronovibrational structure. Electromagnetic propagation follows from the Aether closure relationᵤ curl = c² = 1₀ ₀, a decomposition of the electromagnetic propagation constant into an expansive (Aether unit) and torsional (curl) sector. The charge sector is governed by the phase relation²{eₑmax²} = 8, interprets the fine-structure constant as a geometric ratio between electrostatic and magnetic charge distributions. Gravitational scaling arises from substrate loading: ₐ = GforceC {Fq²}, the SI gravitational constant appearing as a bridge quantity, = Gforce\, C²{mₐ²}. \ These relations unify propagation, charge, and gravitational structure within a single closure hierarchy. Observable constants are interpreted as projections of an underlying volumetric--chronovibrational geometry rather than independent empirical inputs. Numerical evaluation using CODATA 2022 values confirms that the closure relations reproduce the known values of \ (c\), \ (h\), and \ (G\) within the SI system. The resulting framework provides a consistent algebraic structure in which the apparent multiplicity of physical constants reduces to a smaller set of substrate invariants governed by geometric closure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David W. Thomson (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefde9fede9185760d4a4ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19749670
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper