PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics0 citationsOpen Access

Fracture resistance of regenerated immature teeth in different simulated stages of root development: an in vitro cyclic loading study

View Full Paper
KPKyveli-Artemis PolydoraKKKonstantinos KodonasAFAnastasia Fardi

Key Points

  • The aim was to assess fracture resistance in teeth after regenerative endodontic treatment through cyclic loading.
  • Ninety extracted maxillary central incisors were allocated into three experimental groups representing root development stages.
  • Each group underwent cyclic loading until failure, measuring the number of cycles to fracture and peak load.
  • Two control groups were included for comparison against experimental groups.
  • Significant differences were found in loading forces between control and experimental groups (p < 0.05).
  • No significant differences were observed among the experimental groups regarding fracture resistance.
  • Intact teeth exhibited superior mechanical performance compared to regenerated teeth.

Abstract

Objectives: This in vitro study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of simulated stages of root maturation following regenerative endodontic treatment using a cyclic loading method. Methods: Ninety extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly allocated into three experimental groups representing different stages of root development, following revitalization: Group A for completely immature teeth immediately after treatment; Group B for teeth with apical closure, and Group C for teeth with apical closure and wall thickening. Two control groups were also included: Group D for intact teeth and Group E for simulated immature teeth without the bioceramic material. Following simulation of immature apices and treatment with a bioceramic material, all specimens were subjected to cyclic loading using a step-stress fatigue protocol until failure. The number of cycles to fracture and the peak load were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: Statistically significant differences in loading forces were observed between the negative control group (Group D) and Groups A, B, and E (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were detected among the experimental groups. These results indicate that apical closure and dentinal wall thickening alone did not substantially improve mechanical reinforcement under cyclic loading conditions. Conclusions: Although intact teeth exhibited superior mechanical performance, apical closure and wall thickening alone were insufficient to enhance reinforcement under cyclic loading.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Polydora et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4578c0f03fd677635f2https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2026.51.e21
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper