PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Research on Data-Driven Modeling of Solid Rocket Motor Plume Temperature Distribution with Physics Guidance

View Full Paper
BCBo ChengCQChengyuan QianXCXinxin Chen

Key Points

  • The primary aim is to enhance model accuracy in predicting aerospace vehicle plume characteristics through a new prediction algorithm.
  • Developed a hybrid physics-data model using a neural network framework.
  • Employed long short-term memory (LSTM) as the backbone of the prediction model.
  • Integrated prior physical knowledge and empirical rules into the neural network during training.
  • Preprocessed an aerospace vehicle plume dataset to optimize input features.
  • Used specific loss functions that incorporate physical laws for better training outcomes.
  • Achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 31.89 with the proposed algorithm.
  • Reduced MAE by 14% and physical inconsistency by 7.5% compared to Random Forest models.
  • Ablation experiments showed a 25% improvement in prediction accuracy with the introduction of physical mechanisms.

Abstract

Aiming at the problems of the large prediction error of model-driven algorithms and poor interpretability (even potential violation of physical laws) of pure data-driven algorithms in the prediction of aerospace vehicle plume characteristics, a physics mechanism-guided prediction algorithm for aerospace vehicle plume characteristics was proposed. Taking the long short-term memory (LSTM) network as the backbone, this algorithm constructed a hybrid physics–data model by embedding the prior knowledge of physical laws and empirical rules into the neural network, and designed a loss function combined with physical mechanisms to guide network training. The aerospace vehicle plume dataset was preprocessed through characteristic parameter extraction, extended physical parameter calculation, data splicing and sliding window operation, and the LSTM network structure was optimized by adjusting hyperparameters such as the number of hidden layers and neurons. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm achieves a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 31.89 and a Physical Inconsistency of 0.1723 on the test set, with MAE reduced by 14% and Physical Inconsistency reduced by 7.5% compared with traditional machine learning models such as Random Forest. Ablation experiments verify that the introduction of physical mechanisms can improve the prediction accuracy of the model by about 25%. This algorithm makes up for the defects of traditional prediction algorithms, has good generalization ability and physical consistency, and provides an effective method for the prediction of engine exhaust plume temperature distribution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8eca04f884e66b5311fchttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16094373
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper