PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

Towards Sustainable Healthcare Risk Waste Management in South Africa: A Systematic Review of Treatment Practices and Policy Gaps

View Full Paper
TRTumisang RamodipaMSMaasago Mercy SepadiDMDaniel Mmereki

Key Points

  • To critically examine healthcare risk waste management practices and identify policy gaps in South Africa.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Included studies published between 2014 and 2025 from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
  • Analyzed 18 studies using qualitative and semi-quantitative synthesis.
  • Incineration was the dominant treatment method in 72% of studies, linked to ageing infrastructure.
  • 67% of studies identified policy fragmentation and weak regulatory enforcement.
  • 61% reported gaps in training among healthcare workers and waste handlers.

Abstract

Background: Effective treatment of healthcare risk waste (HCRW) is essential for preventing pathogen transmission, reducing toxic emissions, and protecting public and environmental health. South Africa faces a growing burden of HCRW driven by expanding healthcare services, population growth, and increased use of medical technologies. Methods: This systematic review critically examines governance frameworks, treatment technologies, and sustainability gaps in healthcare risk waste management in South Africa. The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2014 and 2025. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed using a qualitative and semi-quantitative synthesis approach. Results: The findings indicate persistent systemic weaknesses in healthcare risk waste management. Incineration remains the dominant treatment method, reported in 72% of the included studies, and is often associated with ageing infrastructure and environmental compliance concerns. Policy fragmentation and weak regulatory enforcement were identified in 67% of studies, while 61% reported training gaps among healthcare workers and waste handlers. Poor segregation practices and illegal dumping were also frequently documented. Only 22% of studies explicitly addressed sustainability or circular economy principles, highlighting a significant policy–practice gap. Conclusions: Healthcare risk waste management in South Africa is therefore constrained by fragmented governance, limited infrastructure, and insufficient integration of sustainable treatment technologies. Strengthening regulatory coordination, expanding non-burn treatment technologies, and embedding circular economy principles are critical to improving environmental performance and advancing Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 12.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramodipa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa97ce04f884e66b5319d2https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23050588
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper