PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Circulation0 citations

Abstract TH894: Blood Pressure at Intensive and Conservative Thresholds has Sex/Gender-Specific Associations With Cognition Function and Decline: a Quantile Regression Analysis in the Health and Retirement Study

View Full Paper
KSKendra SimsKBKirsten Bibbins-DomingoMGMaria Glymour

Key Points

  • Investigate associations between blood pressure thresholds and cognitive function in older adults based on sex/gender.
  • Analyzed data from the Health and Retirement Study with 13,318 participants aged 51-104
  • Primary exposures: intensive (≥120/80) and conservative (≥140/90) blood pressure thresholds
  • Used linear quantile models to evaluate associations with cognitive outcomes across percentiles
  • Men had higher average blood pressure than women
  • Exceeding intensive blood pressure thresholds linked to better baseline cognitive function in higher dementia risk quantiles
  • Lower cognitive decline per year associated with intensive blood pressure control among men after age 70
  • Women showed slower cognitive decline with blood pressure below conservative thresholds after age 70

Abstract

Introduction: Sex/gender and age variability in the impact of elevated blood pressure (BP) on older adult cognitive function remains understudied across the continuum of cognition. Hypothesis: Older women at elevated dementia risk (i.e., lower quantiles of cognition) receive less cognitive benefit than men from intensive systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) control, especially in late-life. Methods: We used Health and Retirement Study participants (n = 13,318, aged 51-104, 57.8% women, 76.3% Non-Hispanic White) with data on our biennially-collected outcome of interest: averaged 10-word immediate and delayed word recall scores. Our primary exposures were exceeding intensive (≥120/80 SBP/DBP) or conservative (≥140/90 SBP/DBP) BP thresholds, measured by sphygmomanometer readings in 2006 or 2008. We estimated linear quantile models for associations of exceeding each BP threshold with level (2006/2008) as well as linear quantile mixed effects models for per-year change (2006-2018) in word recall across 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles, evaluating heterogeneity by sex/gender and age (≤ versus > 70 years). Results: Men had higher average BP (mean SBP/DBP: 134/79 (SD: 20/12)) than women (mean SBP/DBP: 130/79 (SD: 21/12)). Both sex/genders scored comparably on baseline word recall (mean: 5 (SD: 1.7)). Exceeding intensive BP thresholds was associated with better baseline cognitive function among women at quantiles indicating higher dementia risk (e.g., β10th = 0.094, 95% CI = 0.023 to 0.170) and among men at most cognitive quantiles (e.g., β90th = 0.076, 95% CI = 0.010 to 0.156)). Among women before age 70 at lower risk for dementia, exceeding conservative (β75th = -0.019, 95% CI = -0.034 to -0.005) but not intensive (β75th = 0.001, 95% CI = -0.002 to 0.004) BP thresholds were associated with faster per-year decline. After age 70, exceeding intensive BP thresholds was associated with slower per-year decline for men at higher as well as lower dementia risk (e.g., β25th = 0.006, 95% CI = 0.000 to 0.012), though estimated effects were imprecise. Conclusions: In conclusion, BP below intensive thresholds was associated with worse cognitive function and faster decline, particularly among men. BP below conservative thresholds was associated with slower decline among women after age 70. Future work should evaluate whether the health benefits of intensive BP control should be weighed against cerebrovascular pathologies such as reduced cerebral perfusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sims et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa983604f884e66b5320fahttps://doi.org/10.1161/cir.153.suppl_1.th894
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper