PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Circulation0 citations

Abstract TU204: Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: Are They Associated With Increased Cardiorespiratory Fitness?

View Full Paper
LDLaura DeFinaDLDavid LeonardBWBeth Wright

Key Points

  • This research investigates the relationship between GLP-1 receptor agonist use and changes in cardiorespiratory fitness compared to a non-GLP-1 cohort.
  • Observed a cohort of 205 participants using GLP-1 and compared with 10,903 not using GLP-1.
  • Participants reported leisure-time physical activity and completed treadmill testing to estimate fitness.
  • Employs a repeated measures growth model to analyze group differences over time.
  • 89% of +GLP-1 participants were overweight/obese compared to 64% in -GLP-1.
  • Mean body mass index decreased by 2.1 kg/m2 in +GLP-1 with no significant change in -GLP-1.
  • Fitness remained stable in +GLP-1 while decreasing in -GLP-1, indicating worse fitness outcomes in the treatment group.

Abstract

Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1) promote weight loss, improve diabetes, and reduce cardiovascular events in obesity. While physical activity (PA) should be integral to weight loss interventions, the effectiveness of GLP-1, with weight loss in the range of 15-20%, may remove incentives to exercise. Cardiorespiratory fitness (fitness), a marker of habitual PA and health outcomes, may increase with weight loss. GLP-1 effects on PA and fitness are not clear. Thus, in a preventive medicine cohort, the question of whether GLP-1 use is associated with changes in fitness was evaluated. Methods: A cohort of 205 generally healthy men and women reported leisure-time PA and completed treadmill exercise testing to estimate fitness before and during GLP-1 use (+GLP-1), 2009-2024. A similar cohort of 10,903 men and women did not report GLP-1 use (-GLP-1) in the same period. A repeated measures growth model provided estimates of the group difference in fitness changes adjusted for sex, age, time between visits, PA, and weight. Results: Before treatment in +GLP-1, 89% were overweight/obese, 19% were diabetic, and 1% had prior cardiovascular events (versus 64%, 2%, and 1% in -GLP-1). The mean (SD) baseline age was 52.0 (8.5) years in +GLP-1 and 52.3 (9.7) in -GLP-1. In +GLP-1, the mean follow-up was 2.6 years (versus 2.5 in -GLP-1). Mean body mass index decreased 2.1 kg/m2 in +GLP-1 versus no significant change in -GLP-1. Mean glucose also decreased in +GLP-1 (from 108.4 mg/dL to 97.5 mg/dL, p<0.001) but no change in -GLP-1. Mean PA was largely unchanged in both groups (+50 versus +30 MET-minutes/week, p=0.8). Mean unadjusted fitness was stable at 9.1 METs in +GLP-1, p=0.5, and decreased from 11.0 to 10.7 METs in -GLP-1, p<0.001 (group difference in changes p<0.001). Results were similar when adjusted for sex, age, time between visits, and PA changes. However, when also adjusted for weight change, mean fitness fell 0.5 METs in +GLP-1 versus 0.2 METs in -GLP-1, p<0.001. Fitness increased less in +GLP-1 than in -GLP-1 whether weight was lost or gained. Conclusions: Fitness changes in +GLP-1 were largely mediated by weight loss. While GLP-1 use was associated with greater weight loss, fitness outcomes were worse in +GLP-1 than in -GLP-1 with similar weight changes. Healthcare providers should prescribe and monitor PA along with GLP-1 receptor agonists, as tolerated by patient’s overall status, to improve weight loss and fitness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

DeFina et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa989404f884e66b5325fahttps://doi.org/10.1161/cir.153.suppl_1.tu204
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper