PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Obstetric Medicine0 citations

Impact of tighter glycaemic targets on pregnancy outcomes in a multi-ethnic cohort with gestational diabetes: A retrospective, single centre observational study

View Full Paper
MHMohammed SB HudaNMNiki MargariNINafisa Islam

Key Points

  • To determine the impact of tighter glycaemic targets for gestational diabetes on pregnancy outcomes.
  • Retrospective data analysis before and after introducing tighter glucose targets.
  • Analysis conducted in a single center involving 2265 pregnancies.
  • No change in large-for-gestational age babies or macrosomia after tightening glucose targets.
  • Reduction in gestational hypertension and spontaneous vaginal birth rates observed.
  • Increased use of pharmacological treatment noted.
  • Neonatal jaundice decreased, while no significant changes in composite adverse neonatal outcomes.

Abstract

Aims To determine the impact of tighter glycaemic targets for gestational diabetes. Methods Retrospective data analysis before and after introducing tighter glucose targets. Results In 2265 pregnancies there was no change in large-for-gestational age babies (Odds ratio (OR) 1.1; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.8–1.6) and macrosomia (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.6–1.7) following tighter glucose targets. Gestational hypertension (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2–0.7), spontaneous vaginal birth (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4–0.9) reduced and pharmacological treatment increased (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.7–2.8). Composite adverse neonatal outcome (perinatal death, shoulder dystocia, fracture, nerve palsy) (OR 0.6; CI 0.02–14.2 p = 0.76)), Apgar<7 at 5 min, neonatal hypoglycaemia, respiratory distress syndrome or neonatal unit admission did not change but neonatal jaundice was reduced (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2–0.8). Conclusions Tighter glycaemic targets had no impact on large-for-gestational age babies or composite adverse neonatal outcomes. There was reduced spontaneous vaginal birth, gestational hypertension, neonatal jaundice and increased pharmacological treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa98bd04f884e66b53274fhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1753495x261445509
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper