PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Vehicles1 citationsOpen Access

Energy Consumption Prediction for an Electric Vehicle Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study of Regression, Ensemble, and LSTM-Based Models

View Full Paper
JVJuan D. ValladolidJOJuan P. Ortiz

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a benchmark for predicting energy consumption in battery electric vehicles under real-world conditions.
  • Utilized 1 Hz data from ECU/OBD-II interfaces across ten driving routes
  • Analyzed input features like vehicle speed and motor torque
  • Compared five memoryless regression models and three sequence models trained on 20-second windows
  • GRU model demonstrated highest performance with mean RMSE of 0.1142 kWh
  • Bagged Trees identified as the most robust static model
  • Temporal models outperformed static models on dynamic routes

Abstract

Accurate energy consumption prediction is fundamental for enhancing range estimation and trip planning in battery electric vehicles (BEVs) under real-world conditions. This study develops a route-level benchmark utilizing 1 Hz data acquired via ECU/OBD-II interfaces (CAN 500 kbps) across ten diverse real-world driving routes. The input feature set comprises vehicle speed, longitudinal acceleration, estimated motor torque, road altitude, and accelerator pedal position. Ground truth energy consumption was derived from battery voltage and current, integrated via the trapezoidal rule. We performed a comparative analysis between five memoryless regressors (FNN, SVR, GPR, QRNN, and Bagged Trees) and three sequence models (LSTM, GRU, and BiLSTM) trained on 20-second temporal windows. The results indicate that the GRU model achieved the highest overall performance (mean RMSE = 0.1142 kWh, R2 = 0.9545 and MAE = 0.072 kWh), while Bagged Trees emerged as the most robust static model (mean RMSE = 0.1587 kWh). Temporal models outperformed static ones on routes with high dynamic variability, whereas Bagged Trees excelled in five specific scenarios. These findings provide a controlled within-route benchmark for time-resolved cumulative energy estimation and highlight the need for chronological and cross-route validation before drawing deployment-oriented generalization claims.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Valladolid et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa22704f884e66b532cebhttps://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles8050099
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper