PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery0 citations

Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine nebulization with ketamine nebulization as an adjuvant to lignocaine for awake fiberoptic intubation

View Full Paper
BSBhawana SharmaPSPrem Raj SinghHHHemlata Hemlata

Key Points

  • This research aimed to compare the efficacy of nebulized dexmedetomidine and ketamine as adjuvants for lignocaine in awake fiberoptic intubation procedures.
  • Prospective randomized controlled trial
  • 60 patients with difficult airways
  • Group 1 received nebulized dexmedetomidine with lignocaine
  • Group 2 received nebulized ketamine with lignocaine
  • Primary outcome: ease of intubation, secondary outcomes: cough severity and glottic conditions
  • 70% of the dexmedetomidine group reported easy intubation versus 33.3% in the ketamine group
  • Reduced moderate to severe coughing (20% in dexmedetomidine vs. 50% in ketamine)
  • Both groups maintained hemodynamic stability
  • Dexmedetomidine showed improved patient comfort during AFOI

Abstract

Introduction: Securing a difficult airway is pivotal during anesthesia, with the risk of severe complications driving the need for effective intervention. Awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) often necessitates sedatives, which can cause airway obstruction. This clinical trial compared the use of nebulized dexmedetomidine with ketamine, combined with lignocaine, to improve patient comfort and procedural effectiveness for AFOI while minimizing side effects. Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with difficult airways were assigned to one of two groups. Group 1 received nebulized dexmedetomidine (1 μcg/kg) with 2% lignocaine, and Group 2 received nebulized ketamine via nebulizer (3 mg/kg) with 2% lignocaine. The primary outcome measure was the ease of intubation, and secondary outcomes included cough severity and glottic conditions during the procedure. Results: The dexmedetomidine cohort saw a marked improvement in intubation ease and reduced coughing severity, showing a significant contrast to the ketamine group. Specifically, 70% in the dexmedetomidine group reported easy intubation versus 33.3% in the ketamine group, with reduced instances of moderate to severe coughing (20% vs. 50%). Both groups maintained hemodynamic stability. The favorable outcomes observed with nebulized dexmedetomidine can be attributed to its unique pharmacological properties, including anxiolysis, analgesia, and antisialagogue effects, all of which are desirable for AFOI. Conclusion: Nebulized dexmedetomidine with lignocaine proved to be a more effective regimen than ketamine with lignocaine for AFOI, improving patient comfort and ease of procedure without compromising safety. This study highlights the advantageous pharmacological profile of dexmedetomidine, underscoring its potential for airway management in anesthesia. Further research is needed to validate these results and explore wider clinical applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa22704f884e66b532ddfhttps://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_72_24
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper