PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Intra-Set Velocity Decline and Set-to-Set Changes During a Standardized Moderate-Load Back Squat Protocol in Trained Track and Field Athletes

View Full Paper
BCBumchul Chung

Key Points

  • This study aims to characterize velocity changes and fatigue responses during back squats in trained athletes using velocity-based training.
  • Twelve trained track and field athletes performed two sets of five back squat repetitions at 60% of 1RM.
  • Velocity was recorded using a linear velocity monitoring device to analyze mean concentric velocity.
  • Key metrics, including velocity loss and intra-set velocity slope, were calculated across repetitions.
  • Mean concentric velocity decreased from 0.787 m·s−1 to 0.664 m·s−1 in set 1 and from 0.760 m·s−1 to 0.622 m·s−1 in set 2 (p < 0.001).
  • Significant reductions were found in V1, Vmean, and V5 across sets (all p < 0.001).
  • Increased velocity loss and a steeper intra-set decline were observed, highlighting fatigue progression.

Abstract

Velocity-based training (VBT) is widely used to monitor resistance training intensity and fatigue through movement velocity. However, repetition-by-repetition velocity behavior and set-to-set fatigue responses under standardized moderate-load conditions remain insufficiently characterized in trained athletes when the primary goal is monitoring. This study examined intra-set velocity decline and set-to-set changes during a standardized back squat protocol at 60% one-repetition maximum (1RM) in trained track and field athletes. Twelve athletes performed two sets of five repetitions while barbell velocity was recorded using a linear velocity monitoring device. Mean concentric velocity (MCV) was analyzed repetition-by-repetition, and key velocity-derived metrics (V1, Vmean, V5, velocity loss, and intra-set velocity slope) were calculated. MCV decreased progressively across repetitions within both sets (p < 0.001). Velocity declined from 0.787 ± 0.096 to 0.664 ± 0.087 m·s−1 in set 1 and from 0.760 ± 0.088 to 0.622 ± 0.084 m·s−1 in set 2. Significant set-to-set reductions were observed for V1, Vmean, and V5 (all p < 0.001), accompanied by greater velocity loss and a steeper intra-set decline. These findings provide context-specific reference points to assist in interpreting velocity responses for monitoring neuromuscular fatigue during moderate-load resistance training.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bumchul Chung (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fadad703f892aec9b1e8bchttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16094513
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper