PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026American Journal of Agricultural Economics0 citationsOpen Access

The Herfindahl neutral point: A firm‐level threshold for managing market concentration with evidence from US hog packing

View Full Paper
AKAndrew J. KellerKPKrishna P. Paudel

Key Points

  • To derive the Herfindahl Neutral Point for managing market concentration at the firm level.
  • Derived firm-level threshold from standard concentration index.
  • Analyzed monthly hog slaughter data from 2004 to 2024.
  • Defined bridging amounts for firm capacity in relation to the threshold.
  • Firms below the threshold reduce market concentration with expansion.
  • Firms above the threshold increase concentration when expanding.
  • Reallocating federal grants could lower the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index by about 147 points.

Abstract

Abstract This paper derives a firm‐level threshold, the Herfindahl Neutral Point, from the standard concentration index used in merger review. At this threshold, a marginal expansion leaves the index unchanged. Firms below the threshold reduce concentration when they expand; firms above it increase concentration. We derive exact formulas for discrete capacity additions and define bridging amounts that measure how far each firm sits from the threshold. Applying this framework to monthly federally inspected hog slaughter data from 2004 to 2024, we show that the sharp rise in concentration in 2016 is driven by acquisitions at firms that were near the threshold and then crossed it, while the subsequent partial decline reflects sustained growth among mid‐tier packers operating below it. The 2015 acquisition of Cargill's pork business illustrates how bridging amounts organize merger analysis within a standard concentration screen. Reallocating the 34. 7 million in federal capacity grants awarded to hog‐sector processors under a targeting rule based on this threshold lowers the 2024 national hog packing Herfindahl–Hirschman Index by about 147 points relative to the pre‐award baseline. The framework requires only market shares and the baseline concentration index.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Keller et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe2f2164b5133a91a232bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajae.70076
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Restructuring U.S. meatpacking as a resilience strategy against capacity disruptions: will it work?2022 · 8 citations
  2. 2Concentration and competition in U.S. agribusiness2023 · 30 citations
  3. 3Competition, concentration and critical mass: why the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index is a biased competition measure2017 · 6 citations
  4. 4How China's African swine fever outbreaks affected global pork markets2023 · 11 citations
  5. 5Price-Cost Margins and Market Structure1976 · 429 citations