PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Compositionality and systematicity emerge from iterated learning in deep linear networks

View Full Paper
DJDevon JarvisRKRichard KleinBRBenjamin Rosman

Key Points

  • This research investigates how iterated learning influences compositional language and systematic generalization in neural networks.
  • Theoretical exploration of compositional language emergence in deep linear networks.
  • Derivation of learning dynamics over generations using shallow and deep linear network models.
  • Analysis of the relationship between dataset size and systematic generalization.
  • Iterated learning improves systematic generalization compared to standard training methods.
  • Multiple learning generations are necessary for effective compositional structure emergence.
  • Extensive training datasets are required for the network to achieve true systematicity.

Abstract

Humans have a remarkable ability to systematically generalize—reasoning about new situations by combining aspects of previous experiences. Language provides one of the primary examples of this ability and modern machine learning has drawn much inspiration from linguistics. A recent example is iterated learning, a procedure where generations of networks learn from the output of earlier learners. The result is a refinement of the network’s “language” or output labels for given inputs toward compositional structure. Here we theoretically study the emergence of compositional language, and the ability of simple neural networks to leverage this compositionality to systematically generalize. We build on prior theoretical work on linear networks, which mathematically define systematic generalization, by a) applying the analysis of shallow and deep linear network to the iterated learning procedure by deriving exact dynamics of learning over generations; b) refining the definition of systematicity to understand the benefits and limitations of iterated learning. We find that iterated learning does facilitate systematic generalization over standard training paradigms by uncovering compositional substructure in the output labels. Our results confirm a long standing conjecture: that multiple generations of iterated learning are required for compositional structure to emerge, which can outperform a single generation network trained with optimal early-stopping. However, for the network to treat the input systematically and ignore features which do not generalize, the network must be trained on an extremely large dataset. Hence, we define “weak systematic generalization” to explain this emergent systematicity from scale.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jarvis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefd5164b5133a91a3ecfhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2509739123
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax2002 · 258 citations
  2. 2Semantic Cognition2004 · 545 citations
  3. 3Dynamics of specialization in neural modules under resource constraints2025 · 9 citations
  4. 4Principal submatrices IX: Interlacing inequalities for singular values of submatrices1972 · 172 citations
  5. 5Data Distributional Properties Drive Emergent In-Context Learning in Transformers2022 · 7 citations