PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment0 citations

OrbitFlow: SLO-Aware Long-Context LLM Serving with Fine-Grained KV Cache Reconfiguration

View Full Paper
XMXinyue MaHHHeelim HongTUTaegeon Um

Key Points

  • This work presents OrbitFlow, a system designed to manage KV caches efficiently for long-context LLMs to meet latency targets.
  • Introduces a fine-grained KV cache management system called OrbitFlow.
  • Utilizes a lightweight ILP solver for adaptive KV cache placement on GPUs.
  • Implements a fallback mechanism for managing heavy memory loads.
  • Improves SLO attainment for TPOT by 62% and TBT by 66%.
  • Reduces 95th percentile latency by 38%.
  • Achieves up to 3.3× higher throughput compared to existing methods.

Abstract

Serving long-context LLMs is challenging because request lengths and batch composition vary during token generation, causing the memory footprint to fluctuate significantly at runtime. Offloading KV caches to host memory limits effective GPU memory usage, but existing static and predetermined offloading strategies cannot adapt to the rapidly shifting memory demands of long-context serving. This often leads to excessive CPU-to-GPU KV transfers that translate into latency spikes and frequent SLO violations. To address these challenges, we introduce OrbitFlow, a finegrained and adaptive KV cache management system that meets latency SLOs in long-context LLM serving. OrbitFlow employs a lightweight ILP solver to decide which layers' KV caches to retain on the GPU for each request, within memory capacity constraints. It continuously refines KV placements based on runtime feedback when the active plan becomes suboptimal during token generation. Under heavy load, OrbitFlow invokes a fallback mechanism to temporarily defer in-flight requests with large memory footprints, preserving overall SLO attainment. Our experiments demonstrate that OrbitFlow improves SLO attainment for TPOT and TBT by 62% and 66%, respectively, while reducing the 95th percentile (i.e., P95) latency by 38% and achieving up to 3.3× higher throughput compared to existing offloading methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefef164b5133a91a40e8https://doi.org/10.14778/3796195.3796214
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper