PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Journal of Materials Research and Technology1 citationsOpen Access

Cyclic deformation behavior and fatigue life prediction of 316H stainless steel under strain-controlled fatigue

View Full Paper
ZCZhihui CaiZWZhiqiang WangYLYuanlong Lin

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the cyclic deformation behavior and predict the fatigue life of 316H stainless steel under varying strain amplitudes.
  • Conducted low-cycle fatigue tests on 316H stainless steel at room temperature and 600 °C.
  • Analyzed cyclic deformation modes and transitions based on strain amplitude.
  • Developed a modified flow stress-based life prediction model.
  • At room temperature, transition from hardening to secondary hardening occurs as strain amplitude decreases.
  • At 600 °C, significant cyclic hardening is observed at high strain amplitudes.
  • The proposed life prediction model shows accuracy within a factor of 1.5× error band across both temperature regimes.

Abstract

In this study, low-cycle fatigue tests were conducted on 316H stainless steel at room temperature and at the service temperature of 600 °C. The material exhibits highly strain-amplitude-dependent fatigue lives and distinct cyclic deformation modes at both temperatures. At room temperature, the cyclic response transitions from conventional hardening-softening at high strain amplitudes to a distinct secondary hardening regime at low strain amplitudes. At 600 °C, 316H stainless steel exhibits pronounced cyclic hardening at high strain amplitudes and rapid cyclic stabilization at lower amplitudes. EBSD results showed that martensitic transformation occurred mainly at high strain amplitudes, indicating that the secondary hardening at room temperature is primarily dislocation-related. By capturing the transition trend of the cyclic deformation behavior, a modified flow stress-based life prediction model is proposed. The modified model accurately captures the fatigue life across both temperature regimes, with all predictions falling well within a factor of 1.5× error band.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2ba98b49bacb8b34793ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2026.05.011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper