PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Wellcome Open Research0 citationsOpen Access

VALIDATION OF A BEHAVIOURAL, SPEECH SPECTRUM/SPEECH BASED mHEALTH HEARING SCREENER FOR CHILDREN

View Full Paper
DJDeepashree JoshiVRVidya RamkumarRVRamya Vaidyanath

Key Points

  • To validate an affordable mHealth-based subjective hearing screener for children to identify hearing loss.
  • Developed mHealth screener using calibrated headphones and speakers at 60 dB HL.
  • Included modules for various age groups: BOA for 0-1 years, SSAT for 1-3 years, and SRT for 3-6 years.
  • Evaluated performance metrics such as sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and accuracy (ACU).
  • For infants (0-1 years), the BOA+HRR showed SEN = 86%, SPE = 91%, ACU = 90%.
  • In children (1-3 years), SSAT performed best with SEN = 98%, SPE = 85%, ACU = 91.2%.
  • For ages 3-6 years, SRT achieved SEN = 95%, SPE = 89%, ACU = 91.43%.

Abstract

An affordable mHealth-based subjective hearing screener (SRESHT) for children was developed to support contextualized hearing screening for developing countries. The screener was developed with calibrated commercial headphones and speakers at 60 dB HL with the target goal of identifying children with moderately severe or above degrees of disability (WH0, 2019). The hearing screener includes Behavioral Observation Audiometry (BOA) based screening module (0 to 1 year of age), Speech Spectrum Awareness Task (SSAT) module (1 to 3 years of age), Speech Recognition Task (SRT) module (3 to 6 years of age) and High Risk register (HRR) and Parental Questionnaire (PQ) module (0 to 6 years). The study identified optimal screening modules for detecting hearing loss = 60 dB HL for 0–1 year of age, 1 to 3 years of age and 3 to 6 years of age separately. For infants aged 0–1 year, the combined BOA+HRR module was found to be most suitable (SEN = 86%, SPE = 91%, ACU = 90%). In children aged 1–3 years, SSAT module was found to be suitable (SEN = 98%, SPE = 85%, ACU = 91.2%. For the 3–6 years age group, SRT was found suitable (SEN =95%, SPE = 89%, ACU = 91.43%). When test-based screening methods are not feasible, standalone HRR (0–1 year) and PQ (3–6 years) modules remain viable alternatives, meeting the 80% sensitivity and specificity benchmarks to screen for > = 60dBHL.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Joshi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2c718b49bacb8b3480d8https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.25773.2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A systematic review of mHealth-based paediatric hearing screening tools/devices2026
  2. 2Hearing Screening in Adults Over the Age of 60: Validation of an Appropriate Stimulus Level for Successful Hearing Screening2025
  3. 3Psychometric Validation of a Hearing Screening Questionnaire for Preschoolers based on language development evaluation by caregivers2024
  4. 4Digital Speech Hearing Screening Using A Quick Novel Mobile Hearing Impairment Assessment2024
  5. 5Screen-H Website Audiometry as a Diagnostic Tool for Hearing Screening in Patients with Hearing Loss2024