PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 20260 citations

Exhausted bodies with bad attitudes

View Full Paper
MFMary Fotinakopoulou

Key Points

  • The article examines how autotheory reflects material life rather than just personal identity. It argues for a new understanding of the ‘I’ that acknowledges life’s complexities.
  • Analyzes contemporary critiques of autotheory from various authors like Merve Emre and Benjamin Bratton.
  • Focuses on Anne Boyer’s work to illustrate a generative poetics of negation.
  • Explores theoretical connections between the ‘I’ and material experience.
  • Demonstrates that autotheory transcends mere subjectivity, reflecting deeper material concerns.
  • Argues that the assertion of the ‘I’ in autotheory does not negate but redefines it.
  • Highlights the generative poetics inherent in Boyer’s critique, reshaping our understanding of thought.

Abstract

Contemporary criticisms of autotextual forms, from Merve Emre to Benjamin Bratton, and most characteristically Anna Kornbluh’s book Immediacy: Or, The Style of Too Late Capitalism , read the tendency to theorize from the first person back to a generation scripted to operate within the illusory coherence of the ‘I’. Against a clear-cut, totalizing understanding of every other turn to the ‘I’ as an immediacy fetish, this article turns to Anne Boyer’s The Undying to argue that autotheory rather appears preoccupied with the material grounds of life and experience, negating the ‘I’ in the same gesture that it appears to assert it. Finally, I aim to trace how Boyer’s efforts conjure a non-re/productive image of thought that makes of autotheory a generative poetics of negation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mary Fotinakopoulou (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e00bfa21ec5bbf06410https://doi.org/10.1386/jaws_00084_1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper