PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Hydrogeology Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Strategic uncertainty and the delay of groundwater regulation in Australia’s Great Artesian Basin (1886–1914)

SHSarah Hamilton

Key Points

  • This article investigates the factors contributing to the delay in regulating groundwater extraction in Australia’s Great Artesian Basin from 1886 to 1914.
  • Analyzed scientific reports, parliamentary debates, and historical news media from the period.
  • Examined the interplay between legal doctrines and groundwater's perceived invisibility.
  • Assessed the political and cultural implications of groundwater extraction practices.
  • Identified strategic appeals to property rights that resisted regulation efforts.
  • Demonstrated that claimed uncertainties were institutionalized, obstructing state intervention.
  • Showed how these practices led to entrenched extraction regimes that persisted despite scientific understanding.

Abstract

Abstract Since the advent of large-scale groundwater extraction in the late 19th century, efforts to regulate use have encountered not only infrastructural and logistical challenges but also political resistance rooted in water users’ strategic appeals to property rights and incomplete knowledge. This article examines early groundwater development in Australia’s Great Artesian Basin (1886–1914) to show how courts, legislators, and water users invoked groundwater’s invisibility to frame it as unknowable and therefore ungovernable. Drawing on scientific reports, parliamentary debates, and historical news media, it demonstrates that uncertainty was not simply a natural product of subterranean hydrology but was institutionalized through legal doctrines and strategically mobilized to delay oversight. The case situates groundwater within the political ecology of water, showing how claims of uncertainty have historically been used to obstruct state intervention and create path-dependent extraction regimes that became economically and culturally entrenched long after scientific consensus emerged.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sarah Hamilton (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e42bfa21ec5bbf06814https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-026-03069-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper