Abstract This research paper presents love not merely as an emotional, social, or biological phenomenon, but as a form of subtle pranic energy exchange. The study is based on the central premise that authentic human balance becomes possible only when human beings remain energetically connected with living existence—nature, plants, animals, and conscious forms of life. Modern civilization has shifted the center of human relationship away from nature toward non-living systems such as wealth, objects, fame, and consumption. As a result, energy flow has become one-directional: human beings continuously lose their life-force energy without receiving biological or existential replenishment in return. This imbalance is proposed as one of the root causes of modern stress, emptiness, psychological fragmentation, and existential suffering. The paper argues that love is not merely a moral ideal, but a science of existential equilibrium. When energy exchange becomes balanced, ego-free, and spontaneous, liberation (moksha) is no longer a religious achievement but a natural state arising from complete energetic harmony. 2. Introduction Human life is fundamentally a movement of energy. Birth represents the emergence of a concentrated energetic center, while life itself unfolds through the expansion, exchange, and dissolution of this energy. The crisis of modern civilization lies in the fact that love has been reduced to emotional dependency and religion to psychological transaction. Ancient traditions viewed connection with nature, living beings, and the five elements as the basis of existential balance. In contrast, modern systems have redirected human consciousness toward objects, accumulation, status, and consumption. Consequently: relationships have become object-centered, love has become transactional, virtue (punya) has become future-oriented bargaining, and the natural cycle of life-energy has been disrupted. This paper attempts to restore love to its original meaning—as a science of balanced existential energy exchange.
kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.