PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1973Journal of the American Statistical Association884 citations

Stein's Estimation Rule and its Competitors—An Empirical Bayes Approach

View Full Paper
BEBradley EfronCMCarl N. Morris

Key Points

  • This work assesses the efficacy of Stein's estimator compared to the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE).
  • Utilizes empirical Bayes methods to analyze performance.
  • Compares Stein's estimator with other Bayesian rules for normal means estimation.
  • Explores applications in more complex estimation problems with non-normal distributions.
  • Stein's positive part estimator dominates the MLE for k ≥ 3, retaining good Bayesian properties.
  • Other Bayesian rules are identified as useful alternative estimators in specific scenarios.

Abstract

Abstract Stein's estimator for k normal means is known to dominate the MLE if k ≥ 3. In this article we ask if Stein's estimator is any good in its own right. Our answer is yes: the positive part version of Stein's estimator is one member of a class of “good” rules that have Bayesian properties and also dominate the MLE. Other members of this class are also useful in various situations. Our approach is by means of empirical Bayes ideas. In the later sections we discuss rules for more complicated estimation problems, and conclude with results from empirical linear Bayes rules in non-normal cases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Efron et al. (1973) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a086e52ab15ea61dee8d696https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1973.10481350
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper