PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 3, 2020Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society63 citationsOpen Access

Determining the Hubble constant without the sound horizon scale: measurements from CMB lensing

EBEric J. BaxterBSBlake D. Sherwin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Measurements of the Hubble constant, H0, from the cosmic distance ladder are currently in tension with the value inferred from Planck observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and other high-redshift data sets if a flat Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model is assumed. One of the few promising theoretical resolutions of this tension is to invoke new physics that changes the sound horizon scale in the early Universe; this can bring CMB and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) constraints on H0 into better agreement with local measurements. In this paper, we discuss how a measurement of the Hubble constant can be made from the CMB without using information from the sound horizon scale, rs. In particular, we show how measurements of the CMB lensing power spectrum can place interesting constraints on H0 when combined with measurements of either supernovae or galaxy weak lensing, which constrain the matter density parameter. The constraints arise from the sensitivity of the CMB lensing power spectrum to the horizon scale at matter–radiation equality (in projection) ; this scale could have a different dependence on new physics than the sound horizon. From an analysis of current CMB lensing data from Planck and Pantheon supernovae with conservative external priors, we derive an rs-independent constraint of H₀ = 73. 5 5. 3\, km\, s^-1\, Mpc^-1. Forecasts for future CMB surveys indicate that improving constraints beyond an error of (H₀) = 3\, km\, s^-1\, Mpc^-1 will be difficult with CMB lensing, although applying similar methods to the galaxy power spectrum may allow for further improvements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Baxter et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08e976aa03afa536e4b1f4https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3706
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clarifying the Hubble constant tension with a Bayesian hierarchical model of the local distance ladder2018 · 157 citations
  2. 2LSST Science Book, Version 2.02009 · 960 citations
  3. 3Mass Reconstruction with Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization2002 · 642 citations
  4. 4MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics2013 · 1,365 citations
  5. 5Early dark energy does not restore cosmological concordance2020 · 340 citations