PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

B44-28 Rural-Urban Disparities in COPD Prevalence and Symptom Burden: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
SPS PatelJMJ MarchantSBS P Bhatt

Key Result

Rural populations experience a significantly higher prevalence of COPD compared to urban populations, with odds ratios ranging from 1.05 to 4.33.

Key Points

  • This review aims to investigate the differences in COPD prevalence and symptom burden between rural and urban populations globally.
  • Comprehensive searches conducted on multiple databases including Medline and Cochrane Central on May 7, 2025.
  • Screened and assessed eligible peer-reviewed studies comparing rural and urban COPD prevalence or symptoms based on inclusion criteria.
  • Narrative synthesis performed due to heterogeneity in study design and reporting.
  • Out of 2337 records, 21 studies met inclusion criteria with 83% reporting higher prevalence in rural areas (p < 0.05).
  • Odds ratios for higher prevalence ranged from 1.05 to 4.33, with 73% of significant studies categorized as 'good' or 'very good' quality.
  • 83% of studies on symptom burden indicated higher rates in rural areas, with some showing statistical significance.

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review (n=21)

Structured PICO

Does rural residence compared to urban residence affect COPD prevalence and symptom burden?

P
Population
21 studies comparing rural and urban COPD prevalence or symptom burden
I
Intervention
Rural residence
C
Comparator
Urban residence
O
Outcome
COPD prevalence and symptom burden

Rural populations globally experience a higher prevalence and symptom burden of COPD compared to urban populations.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 1.05 to 4.33

p-value: p=<0.05

Limitations

  • Significant heterogeneity in the definition of rurality between studies
  • Heterogeneity in study design and reporting
  • Heterogeneity in the definition of rurality

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a major contributor to global morbidity, with prevalence patterns influenced by socioeconomic, environmental, and healthcare factors. Emerging data suggests that individuals residing in rural regions may bear a disproportionate disease burden compared to their urban counterparts, although how this translates on a global scale is less understood. We conducted a systematic review aimed at examining global differences in COPD prevalence and symptom burden between rural and urban populations. Methods We carried out comprehensive searches of Medline, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central on 7th May 2025 to identify peer-reviewed studies directly comparing rural and urban COPD prevalence or symptom burden. Eligible studies were screened and assessed independently based on inclusion criteria. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity in study design and reporting. Results Of 2337 records identified, 21 studies met inclusion criteria. The definition of rurality showed significant heterogeneity between studies. Eighteen studies compared prevalence, with 28% (5/18) conducted in the United States of America (USA). 83% (15/18) of studies reported higher prevalence in rural areas compared to urban. This pattern was consistent across geographical distributions. Statistically significant differences (p 0.05) were reported in 73% (11/15) of studies demonstrating higher rural prevalence, with odds ratios ranging from 1.05 to 4.33 (figure 1). The majority of the statistically significant studies were ‘good’ (5/11) or ‘very good’ (4/11) quality. Six studies compared symptom burden with 83% (5/6) conducted in the USA and one in China. Measures included dyspnoea/cough (n = 2), COPD Assessment Test (n = 3) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale (n = 2). 83% (5/6) of studies reported higher symptom burden amongst rural patients, with 3/5 of these studies showing statistical significance. The single study demonstrating higher symptom burden in urban area was not statistically significant. Conclusion Globally, rural populations experience a higher prevalence of COPD compared to their urban counterparts. These findings underscore the impact of rural-urban disparities in healthcare provision, socioeconomic deprivation, smoking rates and environmental exposures. In the USA and China, there are higher levels of symptom burden amongst rural populations. Further studies are needed to examine if this pattern is consistent globally. This abstract is funded by: None

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=21). Rural residence vs. Urban residence was evaluated on COPD prevalence and symptom burden (OR 1.05 to 4.33, p=<0.05). Rural populations experience a significantly higher prevalence of COPD compared to urban populations, with odds ratios ranging from 1.05 to 4.33.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4fd2f03e14405aa9b581https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.1823
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rural versus urban living and COPD: a systematic review2026
  2. 2B44-27 Rural-Urban Disparities in COPD Exacerbations and Mortality: A Systematic Review2026
  3. 3B16-06 Rural and Urban Disparities in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Prevalence: Implications of Lifestyle, Healthcare, and Socioeconomic Factors2026
  4. 4Improving Research for COPD in Rural Areas: A Statement from the COPD Foundation Medical and Scientific Advisory Committee2025
  5. 5Geographical variation of prevalence, and under-diagnosis of COPD in urban and rural communities of China: Finding from China Kadoorie Biobank of 0.5M people2013