PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 17, 2025Journal of European Social Policy0 citationsOpen Access

Going beyond inequality: The macro-level origins of redistributive preferences among income groups

View Full Paper
XRXavier Romero‐VidalSHSteven M. Van Hauwaert

Key Points

  • Lower-income groups demonstrate increased support for redistribution as inequality rises, indicating sensitivity to economic changes.
  • Middle- and higher-income groups react more to governments' ideological orientation, altering their support dynamics significantly.
  • Using a time-series cross-sectional design, the study examines data from seven European democracies between 1980 and 2017.
  • Findings reveal essential insights into the political sustainability of welfare states amid economic downturns, highlighting risks to social cohesion.

Abstract

This article explores the macro-origins of redistributive preferences across income groups. While traditional political economy models focus primarily on the role of inequality, our study broadens this perspective by integrating both economic conditions and the institutional context into the proposed explanatory framework. Using a novel time-series cross-sectional design, we examine trends in support for redistribution amongst different income groups across seven European democracies between 1980 and 2017. Our findings reveal distinct patterns of public responsiveness: lower-income groups increase their support for redistribution in response to rising inequality, whereas middle- and higher-income groups are more sensitive to governments’ ideological orientation. Additionally, we observe that economic downturns are associated with declining support for redistribution across all income groups. By uncovering these macro-level patterns and their theoretical implications, our study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the diverse dynamics that shape redistributive preferences in advanced democracies. These findings have important implications for the political sustainability of welfare states, as they illuminate how asymmetrical responses to economic and political conditions across income groups shape the prospects for solidarity and social cohesion in times of economic stress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Romero‐Vidal et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a36a480a429f797332ead0https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287251345918
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence2014 · 198 citations
  2. 2Taking Time Seriously2008 · 1,031 citations
  3. 3Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-19982003 · 3,834 citations
  4. 4Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making2001 · 1,435 citations
  5. 5A Systems Analysis of Political Life1966 · 3,376 citations