PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2025Psychological Reports0 citations

Ethical Muscle: Conceptualization, Scale Development, and Validation

View Full Paper
HPHeung-Sik ParkJBJohn BlenkinsoppJLJun Ki Lee

Key Points

  • The study developed a reliable ethical muscle scale composed of 15 items across four factors.
  • Validation involved a comprehensive approach, including interviews, expert assessments, and factor analysis of data from 544 individuals.
  • A replication study confirmed the scale's reliability and validity, enhancing its applicability in assessing ethical competencies.
  • Results suggest that ethical muscle can significantly impact moral courage and ethical behavior in public administration.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conceptualize ethical muscle, develop a scale to measure it, and verify the scale’s validity. After conducting a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, we conceptualized the term ethical muscle using a competency framework. Identifying its meaningful dimensions, we developed an ethical muscle scale in five phases. First, in-depth interviews were conducted with government employees ( N = 20) using the Critical Incident Technique. Second, an expert panel ( N = 22) assessed the content validity of the items collected during the first phase using the Delphi method. Third, we surveyed government employees ( N = 544) and undertook factor analysis of the data to construct an ethical muscle scale. Fourth, the psychometric properties of the developed scale were identified by confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS. Finally, we conducted a replication study ( N = 213) to confirm and generalize our findings. These phases led to the development of a four-factor ethical muscle scale comprising 15 items. The four factors are moral courage (five items), ethical knowledge (four items), duty orientation (three items), and morality (three items). The validation study demonstrated the reliability and validity of the scale.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4965ad7bf08b1ead5c97https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251370228
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rethinking Social Desirability Scales2010 · 352 citations
  2. 2Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts1992 · 2,340 citations
  3. 3The self-importance of moral identity.2002 · 2,896 citations
  4. 4Competency: A Concept Analysis2008 · 193 citations
  5. 5Expert or experiential knowledge? How knowledge informs situated action in childcare practices2022 · 15 citations