PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 26, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Multivariate statistical analysis of data from the PERMA+4 questionnaire “Subjective well-being of an organization’s employees”: Application of dimension reduction and clustering methods

View Full Paper
ASAndrey Smolyanov

Key Points

  • A stable two-cluster structure for employee well-being was identified, showing a clear distinction between moderate and high well-being groups.
  • The study implemented dimensionality reduction techniques, especially UMAP, achieving a silhouette coefficient of 0.942 in K-means clustering.
  • Utilizing the PERMA+4 questionnaire allowed for a comprehensive assessment of nine well-being indicators among 325 respondents.
  • Findings indicate substantial potential for nonlinear methods to enhance the analysis of psychological constructs and well-being measures.

Abstract

The development of machine learning methods opens new opportunities for analyzing multidimensional psychological constructs traditionally studied via classical statistical approaches. This study presents a comprehensive multidimensional statistical analysis of data on the employee's subjective well-being obtained via PERMA+4 questionnaire. This study used contemporary methods of dimensionality reduction (PCA, t-SNE, UMAP, Isomap, MDS) and clustering (K-means, DBSCAN, agglomerative clustering) to reveal the latent structure of wellbeing data. The quality of the solutions was assessed via a set of validated metrics: the silhouette score, the Kalinski–Harabasz score, and the Davies–Bouldin score. The sample consisted of 325 respondents. Measurements were taken across nine employee well-being indicators included in the PERMA+4 model. This study revealed the exceptionally high effectiveness of UMAP in combination with K-means clustering (silhouette coefficient = 0.942). A stable 2-cluster data structure was identified, reflecting a qualitative difference between groups of employees with moderate (78%) and high (22%) levels of well-being. All measures used showed statistically significant differences between clusters (p<0.001, effect sizes r=0.405-0.672). Correlation analysis of the UMAP space revealed the dominance of a general wellbeing factor (first axis) with a specific role for Economic security as a partially independent measure (second axis). The results obtained not only make a significant contribution to understanding the interaction of the components of subjective employee well-being, confirm its systemic nature, and provide empirical grounds for developing differentiated strategies to improve well-being but also demonstrate the high applicability of nonlinear dimension reduction methods for analyzing the structure of psychometric data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andrey Smolyanov (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af6216ad7bf08b1eae382dhttps://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-bh6gp
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper