PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Journal of Community Health Research0 citationsOpen Access

Architecture and Urban Design for Social Health: A Two-Decade Global Systematic Review

View Full Paper
MFMohammad Dehghani FirouzabadiSPSanaz Rahravi PoodehSTSeyedeh Marzieh Tabaeian

Key Points

  • Key design features like green spaces and walkability enhance social health and community cohesion.
  • Systems linking architectural design factors to social health indicators were reviewed from 44 studies worldwide.
  • Following the PRISMA protocol, a systematic review was conducted across multiple reputable databases.
  • Future research should fill gaps in knowledge about indoor environments and non-Western contexts.

Abstract

Background: Social health is a crucial yet underexplored dimension of human well-being, particularly in architecture and environmental design. While the links between design and physical or mental health have been widely studied, the social dimension remains insufficiently addressed. This review examines how architectural and urban design influence social health outcomes globally from 2002 to 2024. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA protocol. Peer-reviewed articles were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar using Boolean keywords (e.g., “design*” AND “social health”). After screening 16,402 initial records, 44 studies from 14 countries and 31 journals met the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies empirically assessed environmental design factors in relation to social health indicators in real-world settings. Results: Key design features positively linked to social health include access to green and blue spaces, walkability, aesthetics, public safety, mixed land use, spatial layout, and third places. Common social outcomes were enhanced interaction, cohesion, trust, and sense of belonging. The majority of studies focused on outdoor spaces, with fewer addressing interior environments. Conclusion: The built environment significantly shapes social well-being. However, notable research gaps persist, especially in non-Western and indoor contexts. Future studies should apply mixed methods, include diverse cultural settings, and develop standardized frameworks to evaluate the social impacts of design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Firouzabadi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4606031b076d99fa60265https://doi.org/10.18502/jchr.v14i24.19606
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper