Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption is rapidly increasing in several domains, and education is not an exception. One important breakthrough is the application of AI tools to teaching and learning activities that has shown great promise. They can serve as resources for students to use for a variety of academic purposes and decisions. As AI software, such as intelligent tutoring systems, chatbots, and learning boards driven by data, becomes pervasive within schools and universities, students are being given a more individualized, flexible, and responsive learning experience. The use of AI in engineering programs has its own advantages and disadvantages. Artificial intelligence technologies meet numerous roles in education. The growing use of AI in education and research has also led to ethical debate and ways to address it. The AI systems in this study are in dialogue with students and monitor student interactions, and collect such monitoring data. The findings reveal that users findAI useful for the understanding of new concepts, user-adaptive learning, and assistance in decision-making, but challenges regarding dependence, privacy, memory, and ethics persist. These potential negatives just highlight the need for moderation in termsof ethics, some teacher oversight on these types of programs, and keeping tabs on them. This study contributes to our understanding of how students use AI, giving important indications on what we should aim for in promoting responsible and effective use of AI in engineering education.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ranpreet Kaur
Sandeep Dharmadhikari
Hrishikesh Bhagat
Journal of Engineering Education/Journal of engineering education transformations/Journal of engineering education transformation
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kaur et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68d462b631b076d99fa619db — DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v39is1/25133
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: