Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 are approved for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treatment. In clinical practice, the treatment choice depends on visual scoring of PD-L1, which is subjective and semi-quantitative. In this work, we present PD-L1 Quantitative Continuous Scoring (PD-L1 QCS), a computer vision system for granular cell-level quantification of PD-L1 staining intensity in digitized whole slide images (WSI). We derived a biomarker which captures the percentage of tumor cells (TC) with medium to strong staining intensity (PD-L1 QCS-PMSTC) and classifies patients with ≥0.575% as biomarker positive (BM+). Its effectiveness was examined against visual scoring of %TC ≥ 50 in 768 WSI from the MYSTIC trial (NCT02453282). Considering anti-PD-L1 treatment (N = 256) vs. chemotherapy (N = 246), visual scoring resulted in a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 (CI 0.46–1.02) with a 29.7% prevalence of the BM+ group. With PD-L1 QCS-PMSTC, a similar HR of 0.62 (CI 0.46–0.82) with an increased prevalence of 54.3% was obtained.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jan Lesniak
Markus Schick
Thomas Kunzke
npj Precision Oncology
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
AstraZeneca (United States)
AstraZeneca (Germany)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lesniak et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68d463e231b076d99fa6315c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-01107-0
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: