PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2024International Wound Journal2 citationsOpen Access

Recurrence rates after healing in patients with neuroischemic diabetic foot ulcers healed with and without sucrose octasulfate‐impregnated dressings: A 1‐year comparative prospective study

View Full Paper
JLJosé Luís Lázaro‐MartínezMGMarta García‐MadridSBSerge Bohbot

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

To compare recurrence rates after a 1-year follow-up period of healed neuroischemic diabetic foot ulcers after treatment with or without sucrose octasulfate impregnated dressing. A 1-year prospective study with two arms was conducted between April 2021 and April 2023 on 92 patients with healed neuroischemic diabetic foot ulcers. Patients were divided into two groups; the treatment group, that includes patients healed with a sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressing, and the control group, which includes patients treated with other local treatments different from sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings. After healing, patients were prospectively followed up during 1-year and assessed monthly in the specialised outpatient clinics. The main outcome of the study was ulcer recurrence after wound healing within 1 year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were minor or major amputation and all causes of death. Fifty patients in the treatment group and 42 patients in the control group were included. Fourteen (28%) patients suffered from a reulceration event in the treatment group compared to 28 (66.7%) in the control group, p < 0.001. Time to recurrence in the treatment group was 10 (16.26-2.75) and 11.50 (30.75-5.25) weeks in the control group, p = 0.464. There were no observed differences in the minor amputation rates between the two groups: 15.2% (n = 7) in the treatment group and 7.1% (n = 3) in the control group (p = 0.362). Major amputations and death outcomes were exclusively observed in the treatment group. Specifically, four major amputations (8.7%) in the treatment group were complications arising from recurring events complicated by infection during the SARS-CoV-2 period. Seven patients died due to complications not related with local therapy. The relative risk of recurrence was 20.18 times higher in the control group compared with those treated with octasulfate dressing (p < 0.001). Treatment with sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings can decrease recurrence rates of neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers more effectively than neutral dressings. Besides, it may enhance the foot's clinical properties in patients with poor microcirculation, which could aid in preventing future recurrences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lázaro‐Martínez et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e56113e2b3180350efdbf9https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Comparative Study of Topical Insulin Application Over Diabetic Foot Ulcers Versus a Normal Saline Dressing2026
  2. 2A comparative Study of standard dressing verses vac therapy dressing in diabetic foot ulcer patients2024
  3. 3The Effect of Dressings with Granulated Sorbent and Modern Antiseptic Agents on the Treatment of Wound Defects in Patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome2025
  4. 4Ulcer Recurrence Impairs Outcomes of Patients with Diabetic Foot2026
  5. 5Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Traditional Debridement Care in the Treatment of Ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Cohort Study2024 · 6 citations