PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 16, 2024Journal of Managerial Psychology3 citations

Performance appraisal interval and employee exploratory innovation behavior: the curvilinear relationship and the boundary conditions

View Full Paper
JYJun YangBWBin WangBZBin Zhao

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose Compressing project timelines represents a prevalent temporal tactic aimed at accelerating the innovation process. However, empirical evidence on the impact of such time constraints on innovation remains inconclusive. This study aims to investigate the relationship between a prevalent organizational time mechanism—Performance Appraisal Interval (PAI)—and employee exploratory innovation behavior. Additionally, we explore the boundary conditions that may influence this relationship: the moderating effects of future work self salience and supervisory developmental feedback. Design/methodology/approach Using online survey data collected in two waves from 426 employees working in hi-tech companies in China, we tested all the hypotheses. Findings (1) PAI demonstrates an inverted U-shaped influence on employees exploratory innovation behavior; (2) Employees’ future work self salience serves as a moderator that enhances the positive nature of this inverted U-shaped relationship; (3) Supervisory developmental feedback amplifies the moderating role of future work self salience, and the synergistic effect of PAI, future work self salience, and supervisory developmental feedback significantly enhances exploratory innovation behavior. Practical implications By providing insights that are attuned to the temporal aspects of performance appraisal, this study aids organizations in making more informed, strategic decisions that enhance both the effectiveness of performance assessments and the cultivation of an environment that encourages exploratory innovation. Additionally, it is recommended that organizational leaders incorporate future-oriented interventions and developmental feedback into their management practices to further promote employees' engagement in exploratory innovation. Originality/value Drawing on the interactive theory of performance, this study introduces a novel perspective on how an organizational temporal mechanism influences exploratory innovation and advances our understanding of the non-linear link between time constraints and employees' innovative behaviors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6023bb6db6435875959d3https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-03-2023-0197
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Perceived organizational support.1986 · 6,841 citations
  2. 2Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the Job Demands–Resources model2010 · 659 citations
  3. 3Extending the Stage-Gate Model to Radical Innovation - the Accelerated Radical Innovation Model2012 · 26 citations
  4. 4The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.1996 · 5,872 citations
  5. 5The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance1982 · 449 citations