PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 15, 2024Frontiers in Immunology2 citationsOpen Access

Hyper-reflective foci changes in RRMS under natalizumab therapy

View Full Paper
MPMarco PuthenparampilEBElisa BasiliMPMarta Ponzano

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Microglia (MG) is suggested to play an immunopathological role of in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Since hyper-reflective foci (HRF) might mark MG activation, in vivo analysis by Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT) in MS patients under disease modifying therapies may help to clarify MS immunopathology as well as drug's mechanism of intrathecal action. To analyze HRF in patients treated with Natalizumab (NTZ), a high efficacy therapy for MS. The effect of NTZ on the retina of 36 Relapsing-Remitting MS patients was investigated in a prospective, single-center study. OCT was performed immediately before the first infusion and then between infusion 3 and 4, infusion 6 and 7, infusion 11 and 13. Peripapillary and macular scans were acquired, evaluating peripapillary RNFL thickness, macular volumes (vertical scans), and HRF count (horizontal scan) in Ganglion Cell Layer (GCL), Inner Plexiform Layer (IPL) and Inner Nuclear Layer (INL). Clinical examination was performed every six months. HRF count significantly increased under NTZ therapy (p<0.001) in both GCL (18.85 ± 6.93 at baseline, 28.24 ± 9.55 after 12 months) and IPL (25.73 ± 7.03 at baseline, 33.21 ± 8.50 after 12 months) but remained stable in INL (33.65 ± 7.76 at baseline, 36.06 ± 6.86 after 12 months, p=0.87), while no relevant modification of pRNFL and macular volumes were observed during the study. EDSS remained stable and no clinical relapse was observed between month 6 and 12. In RRMS NTZ affects HRF count in GCL and IPL, but not in INL, suggesting that NTZ does not impact on some aspects of MS immunopathology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Puthenparampil et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60461b6db64358759757chttps://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1421755
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hyperreflective focuses as a biomarker of multiple sclerosis progression2024
  2. 2The clinical relevance of hyper-reflective foci in the inner retina at the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis2025
  3. 3Longitudinal Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Reveals Hyperreflective Foci Characteristics in Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients2024
  4. 4Association Between Fatigue, Information Processing Speed and Plasma Levels of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Neurofilament Light in Patients With Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Natalizumab or Rituximab2026
  5. 5Hyperreflective Foci in the Inner Nuclear Layer: Proof‐of‐Concept for an Optical Coherence Tomography Derived Microglia‐Related Marker in Multiple Sclerosis2026