Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Intratumoral immune profiles are related to prognosis and therapeutic efficacy, and could result in personalized treatments based on biomarkers. To develop a multiplex, quantitative, and rapid tissue evaluation method based on the clinically established standard immunohistochemistry (IHC), a 6-marker rapid multiplex IHC was developed based on our previously reported 14-marker multiplex IHC by reducing the number of labels and accelerating the staining procedure. First, fewer labels were required to identify the same immunological features linked to prognosis in 14-marker multiplex IHC analyses. The six selected markers showed a significant correlation with the 14 markers in the immune classification. Next, a rapid staining protocol was developed by optimizing the reaction temperature, chromogen, and washing time, allowing the completion of 6-marker analysis in 5 h and 49 min, as opposed to the several days required for conventional multiplex IHC. Validation of benign tonsil and head and neck cancer tissues revealed a significant correlation between rapid and conventional 6-makrer multiplex IHC in terms of staining intensities, densities of T cells, macrophages, lymphoid/myeloid immune cell ratios, and spatial profiles of intratumoral immune infiltrates. This method may enable quantitative assessment of the tumor-immune microenvironment on a clinically feasible time scale, which promotes the development of tissue biomarker-guided therapeutic strategies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alisa Kimura
Takahiro Tsujikawa
Hiroki Morimoto
Heliyon
Oregon Health & Science University
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
SCREEN (Japan)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kimura et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e62c28b6db6435875beac3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33830
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: