PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 25, 2024International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

To Compare the Effects of IV Bolus Doses Phenylephrine, And Ephedrine Injection in Maintaining Arterial Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Sections-A Randomized Comparative Study

View Full Paper
NPNiranjan PrabhuramRTRaghuraman TRASA. Selvi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic approach for cesarean sections due to its benefits for both the mother and fetus. However, hypotension is a common and potentially harmful complication. Phenylephrine (PE) is frequently used as a vasopressor to manage hypotension during spinal anesthesia, but it can cause maternal sinus bradycardia. This study aimed to compare two strategies for maintaining arterial blood pressure during cesarean delivery: a 20 mcg bolus of phenylephrine followed by a 10 mcg/min infusion (Group P) versus a 6 mg bolus of ephedrine followed by a 0.1 mg/min infusion (Group E). A total of 100 pregnant women scheduled for elective or emergency cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to either Group P or Group E. Systolic blood pressure was well-maintained in both groups during the first 20 minutes. After this period, Group P’s blood pressure stabilized towards basal values, while Group E's remained slightly above basal levels—a statistically significant difference (p < 0.005). Diastolic blood pressure fell in both groups, but Group E maintained slightly higher levels than Group P. Group P had a 24% incidence of bradycardia requiring atropine, while no such cases were observed in Group E. Despite these differences, overall maternal arterial blood pressure was effectively maintained in both groups, with no significant difference in uterine tone or bleeding levels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prabhuram et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e637ebb6db6435875c9474https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v15i2.4684
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hemodynamic outcomes of phenylephrine versus ephedrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A prospective randomized study2023
  2. 2Comparing Intravenous Phenylephrine and Ephedrine for Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial2017 · 5 citations
  3. 3Comparison of bolus phenylephrine, Ephedrine and Mephentermine for maintenance of arterial pressure during Spinal anaesthesia in Caesarean section2021 · 17 citations
  4. 4Comparison between phenylephrine and ephedrine in preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section2012 · 27 citations
  5. 5Clinical Comparative Study of Effect of Two Different Doses of Phenylephrine on Spinal Induced Hypotension during Cesarean Section2021 · 3 citations