Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
5064 Background: Pembro + ola did not significantly improve rPFS or OS vs NHA in unselected patients (pts) with previously treated mCRPC in the phase 3 KEYLYNK-010 study (NCT03834519). Here, we present the results of prespecified biomarker analyses with respect to rPFS or OS. Methods: Pts were randomly assigned 2:1 to pembro + ola or NHA. PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) was measured by IHC (22C3 pharmDx); HRRm, BRCAm, TP53, PTEN, SPOP, ATM, CDK12, TMB, and MSI were analyzed in tissue samples using FoundationOne CDx or ctDNA using FoundationOne Liquid CDx; AR-V7 was analyzed using Epic Sciences’ CTC assay. Associations (continuous scale) with outcomes were evaluated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, and 1- (pembro + ola) and 2-sided (NHA) P values were calculated; significance was prespecified at α 0.05). rPFS and OS HRs for pembro + ola vs NHA by biomarker status are shown (Table), with notable results observed for AR-V7 status. Conclusions: For pembro + ola, PD-L1 CPS had a weak positive association with rPFS, while HRRm and BRCAm had strong positive associations with rPFS; these biomarkers did not correlate with NHA outcomes. We observed a potential benefit with pembro + ola over NHA (for rPFS and OS) in AR-V7–positive mCRPC pts, which requires validation. Clinical trial information: NCT03834519 . Table: see text
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Evan Y. Yu
Se Hoon Park
Jeffrey C. Goh
Journal of Clinical Oncology
University of Washington
University of Minnesota
Radboud University Nijmegen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yu et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e67065b6db6435875faf4b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.5064