PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2024Mesentery and Peritoneum0 citationsOpen Access

AB135. SOH24AB₁11. Single centre experience with managing perforated duodenal ulcer between 2017 and 2021

View Full Paper
MJM. JamilMHMutwaly HaronOEOsama Elfaedy

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: Patients with perforated duodenal ulcer (DU) would present in an emergency setting to the hospital. Previously, open surgery has been the approach of choice for perforated DU. Adoption of laparoscopy in emergency setting in the management of perforated DU has been slow but steadily increasing. This audit will review the background and risk factors of patients presented to the centre and also the outcomes from both open and laparoscopic surgical approach.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jamil et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c930b6db64358764747bhttps://doi.org/10.21037/map-24-ab135
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Post-operative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer: A Systematic Review2025
  2. 2Laparoscopic Versus Open Closure of Duodenal Perforations: A Retrospective Comparative Study in a Rural Hospital, Andhra Pradesh, India2024
  3. 3The Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Patients With Perforated Duodenal Ulcer2023 · 10 citations
  4. 4Predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer2026
  5. 5WP4.17 - Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a systematic scoping review and in-depth evaluation of existing evidence2024