PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2024Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology0 citations

Abstract 3064: Distinct Regulatory Programs Govern Smooth Muscle Cell Fate In Atherosclerosis

View Full Paper
TRTiffany RiascosRWRobert Wirka

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Introduction: During atherosclerosis, some vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) undergo phenotypic modulation, de-differentiating and adopting a fibroblast-like (FMC) or a chondrocyte/osteoblast-like phenotype (CMC). Although FMCs and CMCs appear to occur in succession in single-cell RNAseq data, they occupy distinct locations within the lesion and are associated with protective and deleterious plaque features, respectively. Hypothesis: Smooth muscle cell transitions to FMC and CMC occur via discrete transcriptional pathways during atherosclerosis. Methods: We performed single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) on lineage-traced vascular SMCs isolated from the aortic root of ApoE mice (n=3). Our analysis included pseudotime and RNA velocity analyses of the scRNAseq data, which independently identified a subgroup of Vcam+Cd74+ modulated SMCs as a potential cell state from which FMCs and CMCs appear to originate, each following distinct trajectories. We explored lineage-specific gene expression using the TradeSeq R package and conducted Ingenuity Pathway Analysis on differentially expressed genes to identify relevant upstream transcription factors, which were assayed for lineage-specific motif accessibility. Results: Our analysis showed profound changes in gene expression between the two trajectories as well as differential activation and chromatin accessibility of specific transcription factors at the point where FMCs diverge from CMCs. Within the CMC lineage, we noted heightened activation and chromatin accessibility of transcription factors associated with cellular stress and inflammatory responses, including Tp53, Foxo4, and Irf1. In stark contrast, these factors exhibited diminished activity within the FMC lineage during the same pseudotime interval. Furthermore, coronary artery disease GWAS transcription factors Twist1 and Tcf21 displayed differential motif accessibility over the FMC and CMC trajectories. Conclusions: Our study provides valuable insights into the regulatory mechanisms governing SMC phenotypic transitions in atherosclerosis, and further underscores the importance of GWAS genes in influencing these transitions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Riascos et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6ca83b6db643587648674https://doi.org/10.1161/atvb.44.suppl_1.3064
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper