PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2024Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology9 citationsOpen Access

Autogenous structural bone graft reconstruction of ≥ 10-mm-deep uncontained medial proximal tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty

View Full Paper
ADAhmed Abdel-Monem DewidarMMMohamed Kamal MesregahMMMustafa Mohamed Mesriga

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background Management of uncontained medial proximal tibial defects during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be challenging, especially for defects ≥ 10 mm in depth. This study sought to assess the outcomes of autogenous structural bone grafts to address these defects. Materials and methods In this prospective study, patients with uncontained medial proximal tibial defects ≥ 10 mm in depth undergoing TKA were managed by autogenous structural bone grafts fixed by screws and were followed up for at least 36 months. Patients were followed-up clinically with Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Additionally, radiological follow-up was done to assess bone graft union and implant stability. Results The study included 48 patients with a mean age of 69.2 ± 4.5 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 31.4 ± 3.7 kg/m 2 . The mean defect depth was 17 ± 3.6 mm. With a mean follow-up period of 52.2 ± 12.3 months, the median KSS improved significantly from 30 preoperatively to 89, P < 0.001. The median WOMAC score reduced significantly from 85 preoperatively to 30.5, P < 0.001. The mean ROM increased significantly from 73 ± 12.4 preoperatively to 124 ± 8.4 degrees, P < 0.001. The mean graft union time was 4.9 ± 1 months. No significant complications were reported. Conclusions Autogenous bone graft reconstruction is a safe and effective method of addressing uncontained medial proximal tibial defects in primary TKA. Level of evidence Level IV.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dewidar et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6df9ab6db64358765b440https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00762-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Total knee arthroplasty stabilized with autologous bone graft for tibial bone defect correction2024
  2. 2Management of Grade III Femoral Notching During Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Proximal Tibial Autograft and Countersunk Screw Fixation: A Case Report2026
  3. 3Use of Tibial Cortical Autograft for the Osteotomy Site in Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy2024
  4. 4Extra Articular Tibial Deformity Treated With One Stage Proximal Tibial Osteotomy and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report With Nine Month Radiographic Union and Excellent Functional Recovery2026
  5. 5Use of Nonvascularized Structural Bone Allografts for Reconstruction of Massive Post-Traumatic Segmental Femoral Bone Defects: A Retrospective Case Series2026