PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2024Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha0 citations

The necessity of form and spatial content for defining “apocalypse” and “apocalyptic”

View Full Paper
BRBenjamin E. Reynolds

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The Semeia 14 definition of apocalypse defined apocalypses as a constellation of form, temporal content, and spatial content, but temporal content (particularly eschatological features) remains the dominant lens through which the genre of apocalypse and related texts are understood. Defining apocalypses primarily in terms of eschatology, however, narrows the definition of apocalypse and dismisses some texts that reflect non-eschatological features of apocalypses. Form and spatial content are often neglected in the examination of apocalypses and “apocalyptic” texts. When we pay attention to form and spatial content, along with temporal content, new horizons open for considering what may be considered apocalypse-like. Jubilees and the Gospel of John are presented as two examples of revelatory texts that reflect the form and spatial content of apocalypses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Benjamin E. Reynolds (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e76928b6db6435876df0f1https://doi.org/10.1177/09518207231217237
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper